From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] remove hugetlb syscalls
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 22:42:11 -0200 (BRST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0211132239370.3817-100000@imladris.surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021113184555.B10889@redhat.com>
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> Since the functionality of the hugetlb syscalls is now available via
> hugetlbfs with better control over permissions, could you apply the
> following patch that gets rid of a lot of duplicate and unnescessary
> code by removing the two hugetlb syscalls?
#include <massive_applause.h>
Yes, lets get rid of this ugliness before somebody actually
finds a way to use these syscalls...
regards,
Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-14 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-13 23:45 Benjamin LaHaise
2002-11-14 0:42 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2002-11-14 8:52 ` dada1
2002-11-14 14:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-14 15:13 ` dada1
2002-11-14 15:31 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-11-14 15:38 ` dada1
[not found] ` <3DD3FED2.2010901@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
2002-11-14 20:01 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-11-14 21:06 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-11-14 20:11 ` Rohit Seth
2002-11-14 20:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-14 20:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-14 20:48 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-11-14 21:02 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-14 21:11 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-11-14 21:31 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-14 21:40 ` Rohit Seth
2002-11-14 21:59 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-11-14 21:06 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-11-14 21:06 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-11-14 22:12 Seth, Rohit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44L.0211132239370.3817-100000@imladris.surriel.com \
--to=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox