From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: Bill Hartner <bhartner@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35,and 2.5.35 + mm1
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:17:57 -0300 (BRT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0209181316280.1519-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D88A575.D25CE720@austin.ibm.com>
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bill Hartner wrote:
> I will baseline on 2.4.19 and run both the 3GB and 4GB VoloanoMark test.
>
> I will also test with rmap14a.
I released rmap14b last night, with an SMP bugfix you'll want to have:
http://surriel.com/patches/2.4/2.4.19-rmap14b
> I am currently running (a) rawio on scsi devices and (b) direct io on scsi
> devices for both read and readv on 2.5.35. For this test, I am using an
> 8-way 700 Mhz with (4) IBM 4Mx controllers and 32 disks.
Hmmm, with near certainty rmap in 2.4 still has a bunch of SMP
inefficiencies that'll slow you down on an 8-way. If these are
bothering you I'll do a backport of the 2.5 rmap speedups...
regards,
Rik
--
Spamtrap of the month: september@surriel.com
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-18 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-17 21:14 VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35, and " Bill Hartner
2002-09-17 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-18 1:22 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-18 16:10 ` VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35,and " Bill Hartner
2002-09-18 16:17 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2002-09-18 18:42 ` [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35,and2.5.35 " Bill Hartner
2002-09-27 17:00 ` VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35,and 2.5.35 " Bill Hartner
2002-09-27 18:32 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-02 18:51 ` VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35 + mm1, and 2.5.38 + mm3 Bill Hartner
2002-10-02 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-02 21:03 ` [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35 +mm1, " Andrew Morton
2002-10-02 20:59 ` [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35 + mm1, " Dave Hansen
2002-10-03 13:59 ` [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26+ " Bill Hartner
2002-10-03 16:43 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44L.0209181316280.1519-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva \
--to=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=bhartner@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox