From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 19:54:29 -0300 (BRT)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modified segq for 2.5
In-Reply-To: <20020909224928.GH18800@holomorphy.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0209091953550.1857-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, sfkaplan@cs.amherst.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>

On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote:

> Ideally some distinction would be nice, even if only to distinguish I/O
> demanded to be done directly by the workload from background writeback
> and/or readahead.

OK, are we talking about page replacement or does queue scanning
have priority over the quality of page replacement ? ;)


Rik
-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/

Spamtraps of the month:  september@surriel.com trac@trac.org

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/