From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: Scott Kaplan <sfkaplan@cs.amherst.edu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] start_aggressive_readahead
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 21:19:16 -0300 (BRT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0207282117040.3086-100000@imladris.surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48F039DC-A282-11D6-A4C0-000393829FA4@cs.amherst.edu>
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Scott Kaplan wrote:
> > - We no longer put readahead pages on the active list. They are placed
> > on the head of the inactive list. If nobody subsequently uses the
> > page, it proceeds to the tail of the inactive list and is evicted.
>
> This seems a wise move, as placing them in the active list is only going
> to be beneficial in some very unusual cases.
I'm not sure about that. If we do linear IO we most likely
want to evict the pages we've already used as opposed to the
pages we're about to use.
This means that (1) we want to clear the accessed bit of the
pages we've already read, moving them to the inactive list if
needed and (2) we'll want to keep the about-to-be-used pages
separate from the already-used pages.
regards,
Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-29 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-25 16:10 Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-25 16:44 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-25 19:40 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-26 16:50 ` Scott Kaplan
2002-07-26 19:38 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-28 23:32 ` Scott Kaplan
2002-07-29 0:19 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2002-07-29 2:12 ` Scott Kaplan
2002-07-29 3:05 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-29 15:24 ` Scott Kaplan
2002-07-29 7:34 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-29 7:37 ` Vladimir Dergachev
2002-07-29 7:53 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-29 8:04 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-30 16:11 ` Scott Kaplan
2002-07-30 16:21 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-07-30 16:38 ` Scott Kaplan
2002-07-30 16:52 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-05 18:54 ` Scott Kaplan
2002-07-30 17:13 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-26 20:14 ` Stephen Lord
2002-07-26 20:29 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-26 6:53 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44L.0207282117040.3086-100000@imladris.surriel.com \
--to=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sfkaplan@cs.amherst.edu \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox