From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: Sebastian Droege <sebastian.droege@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@zip.com.au, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFT](2) minimal rmap for 2.5 - akpm tested
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:42:41 -0300 (BRT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0207101741380.14432-100000@imladris.surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020710193545.272bedab.sebastian.droege@gmx.de>
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Sebastian Droege wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 02:31:38 -0300 (BRT)
> Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> wrote:
>
> > If you have some time left this weekend and feel brave,
> > please test the patch which can be found at:
> >
> > http://surriel.com/patches/2.5/2.5.25-rmap-akpmtested
> after running your patch some time I have to say that the old VM
> implementation and the full rmap patch (by Craig Kulesa) was better. The
> system becomes very slow and has to swap in too much after some uptime
> (4 hours - 2 days) and memory intensive tasks...
> Maybe this happens only to me but it's fully reproducable
It's a known problem with use-once. Users of plain 2.4.18
are complaining about it, too.
This is something to touch on after the rmap mechanism
has been merged, Linus has indicated that he wants to merge
the thing in small bits so that's what we'll be doing ;)
kind regards,
Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-10 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-06 5:31 Rik van Riel
2002-07-06 6:28 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-06 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-06 20:00 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-06 20:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-10 17:35 ` Sebastian Droege
2002-07-10 20:42 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2002-07-10 21:56 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-11 6:47 ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-11 9:58 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-11 10:08 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44L.0207101741380.14432-100000@imladris.surriel.com \
--to=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sebastian.droege@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox