From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Cc: Christian Smith <csmith@micromuse.com>,
Joseph A Knapka <jknapka@earthlink.net>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Why *not* rmap, anyway?
Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 19:23:46 -0300 (BRT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0205051922541.22779-100000@imladris.surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E174Qu0-00048i-00@starship>
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Another aspect of the (Free)BSD mm we probably want to hijack is the
> process management, i.e., throttling processes selectively (and in some
> kind of fair rotation) to reduce mm thrashing, which is known to improve
> throughput in high load situations.
We absolutely need something like this, but I'm not sure we'll want
the policy FreeBSD has or one of the many others.
As for the mechanism ... I've had that up and running for about a
year now.
regards,
Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-05 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-21 22:27 Joseph A Knapka
2002-04-22 0:23 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-04-22 2:13 ` Joseph A Knapka
2002-04-22 5:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-04-23 22:40 ` Christian Smith
2002-04-24 0:46 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-24 10:50 ` Christian Smith
2002-04-24 14:20 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-24 14:37 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-04-24 14:52 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-24 15:16 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-04-24 18:31 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-04-25 15:19 ` Christian Smith
2002-05-05 19:04 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-07 18:37 ` Christian Smith
2002-05-07 19:23 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-07 19:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-07 19:47 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-07 19:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-07 23:02 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-08 0:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-08 5:08 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-08 7:59 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-05-08 14:33 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-08 14:43 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-08 16:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-08 16:10 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-07 19:49 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-07 19:53 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-07 19:43 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-07 19:51 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-07 23:11 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-07 21:21 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-07 23:15 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-07 19:37 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-07 19:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-05 18:38 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-05 22:23 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44L.0205051922541.22779-100000@imladris.surriel.com \
--to=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=csmith@micromuse.com \
--cc=jknapka@earthlink.net \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox