From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: Christian Smith <csmith@micromuse.com>
Cc: Joseph A Knapka <jknapka@earthlink.net>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Why *not* rmap, anyway?
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 21:46:20 -0300 (BRT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0204232145120.1960-100000@imladris.surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204232317320.1968-100000@erol>
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Christian Smith wrote:
> The question becomes, how much work would it be to rip out the Linux MM
> piece-meal, and replace it with an implementation of UVM?
I doubt we want the Mach pmap layer.
It should be much easier to reimplement the pageout parts of
the BSD memory management on top of a simpler reverse mapping
system.
You can get that code at http://surriel.com/patches/
cheers,
Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-24 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-21 22:27 Joseph A Knapka
2002-04-22 0:23 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-04-22 2:13 ` Joseph A Knapka
2002-04-22 5:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-04-23 22:40 ` Christian Smith
2002-04-24 0:46 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2002-04-24 10:50 ` Christian Smith
2002-04-24 14:20 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-24 14:37 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-04-24 14:52 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-24 15:16 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-04-24 18:31 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-04-25 15:19 ` Christian Smith
2002-05-05 19:04 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-07 18:37 ` Christian Smith
2002-05-07 19:23 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-07 19:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-07 19:47 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-07 19:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-07 23:02 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-08 0:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-08 5:08 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-08 7:59 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-05-08 14:33 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-08 14:43 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-08 16:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-08 16:10 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-07 19:49 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-07 19:53 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-07 19:43 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-07 19:51 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-07 23:11 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-07 21:21 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-07 23:15 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-07 19:37 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-07 19:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-05 18:38 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-05 22:23 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44L.0204232145120.1960-100000@imladris.surriel.com \
--to=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=csmith@micromuse.com \
--cc=jknapka@earthlink.net \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox