From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Non-linear mappings and truncate/madvise(MADV_DONTNEED)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 16:01:34 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404191548030.24243-100000@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040419133240.GA14482@mail.shareable.org>
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> A couple of thoughts on non-linear mappings. Vanilla 2.6.5.
>
> I'm reading madvise_dontneed() and thinking about that zap_page_range()
> call. It'll wipe non-linear file offset ptes, won't it?
Yes, at present.
> MADV_DONTNEED is actually a reasonable thing to do with a non-linear
> mapping, when you no longer need some of the pages. You could argue
> that losing the offsets is acceptable in this case, but I think it's a
> poor argument. The offsets should be preserved while zapping the ptes.
Yes. And I think it also implies that the ->populate functions
are wrong to fail beyond EOF, should just set up file ptes there.
> Then there's vmtruncate() and invalidate_mmap_range() which calls
> zap_page_range(). When you call truncate(), the non-linear offsets
> appear to be lost (I'm reading the code, not testing it) for the part
> of each VMA corresponding to where the linear mapping would have been.
>
> That means (a) a peculiar part of the mapping is lost, and (b) some of
> the truncated pages will stay mapped, if they're in a part of a VMA
> which didn't get wiped by the linear calculation.
>
> Do any of the latest objrmap patches fix these problems? Have I
> misdiagnosed these problems?
rmap 6 nonlinear truncation (which never appeared on LKML, though
sent twice) fixed most of this, and went into 2.6.6-rc1-bk4 last
night: please check it out.
But I just converted madvise_dontneed by rote, adding a NULL arg to
zap_page_range, missing your point that it should respect nonlinearity.
And I made the zap_details structure private to mm/memory.c since I
hadn't noticed anything outside needing it: I'll fix that up later
and post a patch.
I'm haven't and don't intend to change the behaviour of ->populate,
without agreement from others - Ingo? Jamie?
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-19 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-19 13:32 Jamie Lokier
2004-04-19 15:01 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2004-04-22 7:50 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0404191548030.24243-100000@localhost.localdomain \
--to=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox