From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:26:58 +0000 (GMT) From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: What does pkmap stand for? In-Reply-To: <148890000.1043258207@titus> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > I think it's "persistant kernel map". You can't hold the atomic version > over a schedule (unless you catch faults & patch it up). > Sounds plausible, that is the meaning I'll go for as it makes the most sense. It was pointed out to me that there is another area where Permanent Kmaps are mentioned in arch/i386/init.c but there, it actually is permanent kmaps reserved for atomic usage Thanks -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/