From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch, feature] nonlinear mappings, prefaulting support, 2.5.42-F8
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:02:26 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210141642160.3474-100000@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021014135232.GB4488@holomorphy.com>
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > +int sys_remap_file_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
> > + unsigned long prot, unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
>
> ISTR suggesting vectorizing this to reduce syscall traffic.
well, i dont agree with vectorizing everything, unless it's some really
lightweight thing and/or the operation is somehow naturally vectorized.
(block and network IO, etc.)
> The semantics of faulting in pages on such a region, while not
> incorrect, are at least unusual enough to raise the question of whether
> it's appropriate for the kernel to fill the pages as opposed to
> returning an error to userspace. [...]
the pagefault path simply does not have the information whether a mapping
was nonlinear, possibly long before. In the initial patch i had a
VM_RANDOM flag for vmas, which was set up at mmap() time, but this
restricted the API needlessly. Tracking whether a mapping was remapped
randomly before does not sound too useful to me either. So right now it's
the responsibility of the user to use the API in a meaningful way - is it
such a big problem?
> [...] The requirement of MAP_LOCKED or PROT_NONE might as well be
> in-kernel if the file offset contiguity assumption is not met, [...]
how would you do this actually, without other restrictions?
> sys_remap_file_pages() also interacts in an unusual way with the
> semantics of MAP_POPULATE. MAP_POPULATE seems to perform a non-blocking
> make_pages_present() operation not shared with MAP_LOCKED, [...]
what it does is a blocking make_pages_present(), for nonblocking you also
need to specify MAP_NONBLOCK. I agree that the mlock path should/could be
merged with the populate path, this was suggested by Linus as well.
> [...] and filemap_populate() performs the file offset contiguous
> prefaulting which again doesn't mix well with the scatter gather
> semantics desired.
huh?
> Also, a stranger phenomenon appears in filemap_populate(), where
> nonblock may be true, and so filemap_getpage() will return NULL, but
> -ENOMEM is returned if filemap_getpage() returns NULL.
true, this is a bug, i fixed it in the -F9 patch at:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/remap-file-pages-patches/
> Also, I see a significant portion of filemap_nopage() duplicated in
> filemap_getpage(), including long-stale hashtable-related comments.
check the announcement email for details about the seemingly duplicated
code of filemap_nopage() and filemap_getpage(). And which hashing comments
do you mean? We still hash pagecache pages.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-14 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-14 12:38 Ingo Molnar
2002-10-14 12:45 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-14 13:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-14 13:18 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-14 13:52 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-14 15:02 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2002-10-14 15:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-14 15:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-14 15:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-14 16:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-14 21:02 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-14 21:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-14 21:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-10-14 20:27 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-15 1:18 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-10-15 6:48 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0210141642160.3474-100000@localhost.localdomain \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox