From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:37:04 -0600 (MDT) From: Thunder from the hill Subject: Re: [OOPS] 2.5.27 - __free_pages_ok() In-Reply-To: <1027383490.32299.94.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Alan Cox Cc: Paul Larson , Rik van Riel , lkml , linux-mm@kvack.org, haveblue@us.ibm.com List-ID: Hi, On 23 Jul 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > egcs-1.1.2 does have real problems with 2.5 > > 7.1 errata/7.2/7.3 gcc 2.96 appear quite happy So what compiler could I use on my sparc64? IIRC, the current gcc versions failed to make up clean bytecode, and the older versions fail to deal with newer code... I've seen the gcc 3.1 test report from Dave Miller, and I knew it could be nasty times if I try to get used to it... Regards, Thunder -- (Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode) ------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Version: 3.12 GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$ N--- o? K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G e++++ h* r--- y- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/