From: Craig Kulesa <ckulesa@as.arizona.edu>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH] Updated rmap VM for 2.5.23 (SMP, preempt fixes)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 05:08:37 -0700 (MST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206200451590.4448-100000@loke.as.arizona.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206181340380.3031-100000@loke.as.arizona.edu>
Fixed patches have been uploaded that fix significant bugs in the rmap
implementations uploaded yesterday. Please use the NEW patches (with "-2"
appended to the filename) instead. ;)
In particular, neither patch was preempt-safe; thanks go to William Irwin
for catching it. A spinlocking bug that kept SMP-builds from booting was
tripped across by Steven Cole; it affects the big rmap13b patch but not
the minimal one. That should be fixed now too. If it breaks for you, I
want to know about it! :)
Here's the changelog:
2.5.23-rmap-2: rmap on top of the 2.5.23 VM
- Make pte_chain_lock() and pte_chain_unlock()
preempt-safe (thanks to wli for pointing this out)
2.5.23-rmap13b-2: Rik's full rmap patch, applied to 2.5.23
- Make pte_chain_lock() and pte_chain_unlock()
preempt-safe (thanks to wli for pointing this out)
- Allow an SMP-enabled kernel to boot! Change bogus
spin_lock(&mapping->page_lock) invocations to either
read_lock() or write_lock(). This alters drop_behind()
in readahead.c, and reclaim_page() in vmscan.c.
- Keep page_launder_zone from blocking on recently written
data by putting clustered writeback pages back at the
beginning of the inactive dirty list. This touches
mm/page-writeback.c and fs/mpage.c. Thanks go to Andrew
Morton for clearing this issue up for me.
- Back out Andrew's read-latency2 changes at his
suggestion; it's distracting to the issue of evaluating
rmap. Thusly, we are now using the unmodified 2.5.23
IO scheduler.
FYI, these are the patches that I will benchmark in the next email.
-Craig
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-20 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-19 11:18 [PATCH] (1/2) reverse mapping VM for 2.5.23 (rmap-13b) Craig Kulesa
2002-06-19 16:18 ` Andrew Morton
2002-06-19 17:00 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-19 17:11 ` Dave Jones
2002-06-19 17:35 ` Rik van Riel
2002-06-19 19:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-19 20:21 ` Craig Kulesa
2002-06-19 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 12:25 ` VM benchmarks for 2.5 (mainline & rmap patches) Craig Kulesa
2002-06-24 21:34 ` [PATCH] (1/2) reverse mapping VM for 2.5.23 (rmap-13b) Martin J. Bligh
2002-06-24 21:39 ` Rik van Riel
2002-06-24 21:56 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-07-04 5:19 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-24 15:02 ` Rik van Riel
2002-06-19 19:04 ` Steven Cole
2002-06-19 22:44 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-20 12:08 ` Craig Kulesa [this message]
2002-06-20 12:45 ` [PATCH] Updated rmap VM for 2.5.23 (SMP, preempt fixes) Craig Kulesa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0206200451590.4448-100000@loke.as.arizona.edu \
--to=ckulesa@as.arizona.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox