From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from burns.conectiva (burns.conectiva [10.0.0.4]) by perninha.conectiva.com.br (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E7A838C20 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 22:38:18 -0300 (EST) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:49:50 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel Subject: RE: Process not given >890MB on a 4MB machine ????????? In-Reply-To: <5D2F375D116BD111844C00609763076E050D1681@exch-staff1.ul.ie> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-To: , ReSent-Message-ID: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Gabriel.Leen" Cc: Benjamin LaHaise , "'ebiederm@xmission.com'" , "'tvignaud@mandrakesoft.com'" , "'brian@worldcontrol.com'" , "'arjan@fenrus.demon.nl'" List-ID: On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Gabriel.Leen wrote: > I hope (fingers crossed) that there is some way around this > I think that Redhat now supports up to 64GB of ram, > as the Xeon has 36 address lines, see attached. > > I'm only grasping at straws here, but I hope that it is somehow > possible on this machine? The Xeon allows up to 36 bits of physical memory, but still only 32 bits of virtual address space per process... Rik -- IA64: a worthy successor to the i860. http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/