From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Accelerate dbench
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 23:39:46 -0300 (BRST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0108042338130.2526-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01080504334100.00294@starship>
On Sun, 5 Aug 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> - SetPageReferenced(page);
> + if (PageActive(page))
> + SetPageReferenced(page);
> + else
> + activate_page(page);
>
> So I'll try it...<time passes>...OK, it doesn't make a lot of
> difference, results still range from "pretty good" to "really
> great". Not really suprising, I have this growing gut feeling
> that we're not doing that well on the active page aging anyway,
Yes, I have the feeling that exponential down aging wasn't
such a good idea in combination with the fact that most of
the access bits are "hidden" in page tables ...
> and that random selection of candidates for trial on the
> inactive queue would perform almost as well - which might be
> worth testing. Anyway, I'm putting this on the back burner for
> now. Interesting as it is, it's hardly a burning issue.
Well, we found that doing instant activation gives a huge
performance increase. That's one important point already ;)
regards,
Rik
--
IA64: a worthy successor to i860.
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-05 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-05 0:04 Daniel Phillips
2001-08-05 0:02 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-05 2:33 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-05 2:39 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2001-08-06 17:20 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-06 0:28 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33L.0108042338130.2526-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva \
--to=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox