From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: write drop behind effect on active scanning
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 12:39:31 -0300 (BRST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105231237510.311-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105221910361.864-100000@freak.distro.conectiva>
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> I just noticed a "bad" effect of write drop behind yesterday during some
> tests.
>
> The problem is that we deactivate written pages, thus making the inactive
> list become pretty big (full of unfreeable pages) under write intensive IO
> workloads.
>
> So what happens is that we don't do _any_ aging on the active list, and in
> the meantime the inactive list (which should have "easily" freeable
> pages) is full of locked pages.
>
> I'm going to fix this one by replacing "deactivate_page(page)" to
> "ClearPageReferenced(page)" in generic_file_write(). This way the written
> pages are aged faster but we avoid the bad effect just described.
>
> Any comments on the fix ?
1) I agree with it, drop-behind should make the pages we write
very likely for eviction, but we don't want that to stop the
eviction of other not-used pages ...
2) OTOH, if writeout of dirty pages is a problem for the system,
I guess we will want to fix that problem somehow ;)
(but that's another issue)
regards,
Rik
--
Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-23 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-23 7:33 Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-23 14:33 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-23 13:25 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-23 15:30 ` Mark Hahn
2001-05-23 14:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-23 15:39 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0105231237510.311-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva \
--to=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox