linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <mikeg@wen-online.de>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Oeser <ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 08:45:57 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105190705550.491-100000@mikeg.weiden.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105182310580.5531-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>

On Fri, 18 May 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:

> On Fri, 18 May 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> > On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 07:44:39PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > > This is the core of why we cannot (IMHO) have a discussion
> > > of whether a patch introducing new VM tunables can go in:
> > > there is no clear overview of exactly what would need to be
> > > tunable and how it would help.
> >
> > It's worse than that.  The workload on most typical systems is not
> > static.  The VM *must* be able to cope with dynamic workloads.  You
> > might twiddle all the knobs on your system to make your database run
> > faster, but end up in such a situation that the next time a mail flood
> > arrives for sendmail, the whole box locks up because the VM can no
> > longer adapt.
>
> That's another problem, indeed ;)
>
> Ingo, Mike, please keep this in mind when designing
> tunables or deciding which test you want to run today
> in order to look how the VM is performing.

I've bent your code up a bit.  I've not yet been tempted to replace
any of it with a knob ;-)  There is a little piece I'd like to see
thrown away though.. the loop in refill_inactive does nothing good.

The test I prefer is a good one for the area of vm performance I'm
most interested in.  It doesn't cover the full vm spectrum by any
means.  I don't have a setup (any) good for testing mondo network or
IO stuff.  I test a simple 'job one size to large' scenario.  Yes,
it's limited test coverage.. it's still legitimate.

Perhaps when you're evaluating vm performance, you should try my
simple test once in a while. :) I'll bet you a bogobeer right here
and now that when 2.4.5 hits the street you're going to be queried
by the big-busy-box folks wrt swap volume.

> Basic rule for VM: once you start swapping, you cannot
> win;  All you can do is make sure no situation loses
> really badly and most situations perform reasonably.

I disagree with that.  I've seen a heavily swapping box run like
a scaulded ass ape many times.

	Warsteiner,

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-05-19  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105181403280.5531-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105181936240.583-100000@mikeg.weiden.de>
2001-05-18 18:19   ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-18 18:23     ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 18:58       ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-18 20:12         ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 20:24         ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-18 20:09       ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-18 22:44         ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-18 22:58           ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-19  2:12             ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-19  2:32               ` Mike Castle
2001-05-19  6:45               ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2001-05-19  4:40             ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-19 17:13             ` [RFC][PATCH] " Mike Galbraith
2001-05-19 21:41               ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-20  3:29                 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20  6:42                   ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-20  8:08                     ` Mike Galbraith
     [not found]                       ` <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105200546241.5531-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
2001-05-20  9:47                         ` Mike Galbraith
     [not found]                           ` <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105200703270.5531-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
2001-05-21 13:36                             ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-20 21:54                         ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-21 20:32                           ` David Weinehall
2001-05-23 15:34                             ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-23 17:24                               ` Jonathan Morton
2001-05-25  8:39                               ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-23 17:51                             ` Scott Anderson
2001-05-25  8:10                               ` David Weinehall
2001-05-25 18:39                               ` Pavel Machek
2001-06-04 19:22                           ` RPM Installation - Compilation errors jalaja devi
2001-05-24  8:48                         ` [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Mike Galbraith
2001-05-24  9:10                           ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-24 10:32                             ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-24 11:03                               ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-24 14:23                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 15:32                   ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-20 17:38                     ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 13:44               ` Zlatko Calusic
2001-05-20 17:58                 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-05-20 19:32                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-20 21:03               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-21  3:54                 ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0105190705550.491-100000@mikeg.weiden.de \
    --to=mikeg@wen-online.de \
    --cc=ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox