linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 3rd version of R/W mmap_sem patch available
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:13:42 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0103200911490.1605-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010320173349.A4839@fred.local>


On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > I don't think it's worth it. We should have basically zero contention on
> > this lock now, and adding complexity to try to release it sounds like a
> > bad idea when the only way to make contention on it is (a) kswapd (only
> > when paging stuff out) and (b) multiple threads (only when taking
> > concurrent page faults).
>
> Isn't (b) a rather common case in multi threaded applications ?

Not if you're performance-sensitive, I bet. If you take so many pagefaults
that the page_table_lock ends up being a problem, you have _more_ problems
than that.

We'll see. I will certainly re-consider if it ends up being shown to be a
real problem. spinlock contention tends to be very easy to see on kernel
profiles, especially the way they're done on Linux/x86 (inline - so you
see evrey contention place separately).

		Linus

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-03-20 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0103191802330.2076-100000@mikeg.weiden.de>
2001-03-20  1:56 ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-19 22:46   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-20  2:46   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-20  4:15     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-03-20  6:07       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-20  4:29         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-03-20  6:36           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-20  7:03             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-20  8:19               ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-03-20 15:11     ` Andrew Morton
2001-03-20 15:15       ` Jeff Garzik
2001-03-20 15:16       ` Jeff Garzik
2001-03-20 15:31         ` Andrew Morton
2001-03-21  1:59           ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-03-20 16:08       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-20 16:33         ` Andi Kleen
2001-03-20 17:13           ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2001-03-20 19:33           ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-20 22:51             ` Andrew Morton
2001-03-22 10:24         ` Andrew Morton
2001-03-25 14:53     ` [patch] pae-2.4.3-A4 Ingo Molnar
2001-03-25 16:33       ` Russell King
2001-03-25 18:07       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-25 18:51         ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found] <3AB6C7C2.D1A49FEF@uow.edu.au>
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.31.0103191932240.7210-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
2001-03-20 12:38   ` 3rd version of R/W mmap_sem patch available Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-03-20 14:02     ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.31.0103200911490.1605-100000@penguin.transmeta.com \
    --to=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox