From: Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@f-secure.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: "James A. Sutherland" <jas88@cam.ac.uk>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: suspend processes at load (was Re: a simple OOM ...)
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 15:23:15 +0200 (MET DST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0104191506560.20939-100000@fs131-224.f-secure.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0104181918290.17635-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> "Painfully slow" when you are thrashing == "root cannot login
> because his login times out every time he tries to login".
> THIS is why we need process suspension in the kernel.
man 5 login.defs
vi /etc/security/limits.conf
> Also think about the problem a bit more. If the "painfully slow
> progress" is getting less work done than the amount of new work
> that's incoming (think of eg. a mailserver), then the system has
> NO WAY to ever recover ... at least, not without the system
> administrator walking by after the weekend.
This is also quite typical for inexperienced web admins and guess what?
They learn to use resource limits and config settings.
Szaka
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-19 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-12 16:58 [PATCH] a simple OOM killer to save me from Netscape Slats Grobnik
2001-04-12 18:25 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-12 18:49 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-13 6:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-04-13 16:20 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-14 1:20 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-04-16 21:06 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-16 21:40 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-16 22:12 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-16 22:21 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-17 14:26 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-17 19:53 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-17 20:44 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-17 20:59 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-17 21:09 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-14 7:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-04-15 5:05 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-15 5:20 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-16 11:52 ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-16 12:17 ` suspend processes at load (was Re: a simple OOM ...) Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-17 19:48 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-18 21:32 ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-18 20:38 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-18 23:25 ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-18 22:29 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-19 10:14 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-04-19 13:23 ` Szabolcs Szakacsits [this message]
2001-04-19 2:11 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-19 7:08 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-19 13:37 ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-19 12:26 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-04-19 12:30 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-19 9:15 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-19 18:34 ` Dave McCracken
2001-04-19 18:47 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-19 18:53 ` Dave McCracken
2001-04-19 19:10 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-20 14:58 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-21 6:10 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-19 19:13 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-19 19:47 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2001-04-20 12:44 ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-19 20:06 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-20 12:29 ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-20 11:50 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-20 13:32 ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-20 14:30 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-22 10:21 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-20 12:25 ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-21 6:08 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-20 12:18 ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-22 10:19 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-17 10:58 ` limit for number of processes Uman
2001-04-19 14:03 suspend processes at load (was Re: a simple OOM ...) Jonathan Morton
2001-04-19 18:25 ` Dave McCracken
2001-04-19 18:32 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-19 20:23 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-20 12:14 ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-04-20 12:02 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-20 14:48 ` Dave McCracken
2001-04-21 5:49 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-21 19:16 ` Joseph A. Knapka
2001-04-21 19:41 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-22 10:08 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-22 16:53 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-22 17:06 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-22 18:18 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-22 18:57 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-22 19:41 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-22 20:33 ` Jean Francois Martinez
2001-04-22 20:21 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-22 20:36 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-22 19:01 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-22 19:11 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-22 20:36 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-22 19:30 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-22 20:35 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-22 20:41 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-22 20:58 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-22 21:26 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-22 22:26 ` Jonathan Morton
2001-04-23 5:55 ` James A. Sutherland
2001-04-23 5:59 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-21 20:29 ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-22 10:08 ` James A. Sutherland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.30.0104191506560.20939-100000@fs131-224.f-secure.com \
--to=szaka@f-secure.com \
--cc=jas88@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox