From: Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
To: Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
Cc: Kanoj Sarcar <kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, mingo@redhat.com, alan@redhat.com
Subject: Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:06:25 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0102151104110.15790-100000@today.toronto.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010215115536.A1257@pcep-jamie.cern.ch>
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Ben LaHaise wrote:
> > x86 hardware goes back to the page tables whenever there is an attempt to
> > change the access it has to the pte. Ie, if it originally accessed the
> > page table for reading, it will go back to the page tables on write. I
> > believe most hardware that performs accessed/dirty bit updates in hardware
> > behaves the same way.
>
> I think the scenario in question is this:
>
> Processor 2 has recently done some writes, so the dirty bit is set in
> processor 2's TLB.
>
> Processor 1 clears the dirty bit atomically.
>
> Processor 2 does some more writes, and does not check the page table
> because the page is already dirty in its TLB.
>
> Result: The later writes on processor 2 do not mark the page dirty.
Yeah, but the tlb is flushed in those cases (look for flush_tlb_page in
try_to_swap_out).
-ben
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-15 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-15 1:50 Kanoj Sarcar
2001-02-15 2:13 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-02-15 2:37 ` Kanoj Sarcar
2001-02-15 10:55 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-02-15 16:06 ` Ben LaHaise [this message]
2001-02-15 16:35 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-02-15 17:23 ` Kanoj Sarcar
2001-02-15 17:27 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-02-15 17:38 ` Kanoj Sarcar
2001-02-15 17:46 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-02-15 17:47 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-02-15 18:05 ` Kanoj Sarcar
2001-02-15 18:23 ` Kanoj Sarcar
2001-02-15 18:42 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-02-15 18:57 ` Kanoj Sarcar
2001-02-15 19:06 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-02-15 19:19 ` Kanoj Sarcar
2001-02-15 18:51 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-02-15 19:05 ` Kanoj Sarcar
2001-02-15 19:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-02-15 19:07 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.30.0102151104110.15790-100000@today.toronto.redhat.com \
--to=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox