From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 20:42:08 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] using a memory_clock_interval In-Reply-To: <200108210022.f7L0Mf320610@mailg.telia.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Roger Larsson Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Roger Larsson wrote: > It runs, lets ship it... > > First version of a patch that tries to USE a memory_clock to determine > when to run kswapd... > > Limits needs tuning... but it runs with almost identical performace as the > original. > Note: that the rubberband is only for debug use... > > I will update it for latest kernel... but it might be a week away... Roger, Why are you using memory_clock_interval (plus pages_high, of course) as the global inactive target ? That makes the inactive target not dynamic anymore. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/