From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 18:54:00 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: 0-order allocation problem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > So something like the appended (UNTESTED!) should be better. How does it > > work for you? > > Many thanks for your explanation. You've convinced me that > create_buffers() has very good reason to make that effort. > > Your patch works fine for me, for getting things moving again. > I'm not sure if you thought it would stop my "0-order allocation failed" > messages: no, I still get a batch of those before it settles back to work. What is the mask of the failing allocations ? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/