linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
	"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: write drop behind effect on active scanning
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 10:25:06 -0300 (BRT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105231022060.1874-100000@freak.distro.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0105231633440L.06233@starship>


On Wed, 23 May 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> On Wednesday 23 May 2001 09:33, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just noticed a "bad" effect of write drop behind yesterday during
> > some tests.
> >
> > The problem is that we deactivate written pages, thus making the
> > inactive list become pretty big (full of unfreeable pages) under
> > write intensive IO workloads.
> >
> > So what happens is that we don't do _any_ aging on the active list,
> > and in the meantime the inactive list (which should have "easily"
> > freeable pages) is full of locked pages.
> >
> > I'm going to fix this one by replacing "deactivate_page(page)" to
> > "ClearPageReferenced(page)" in generic_file_write(). This way the
> > written pages are aged faster but we avoid the bad effect just
> > described.
> >
> > Any comments on the fix ?
> 
>   page->age = 0 ?

That would make any full scan through the active list move all dropped
pages from generic_file_write() to the inactive list.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-23 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-23  7:33 Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-23 14:33 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-23 13:25   ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2001-05-23 15:30     ` Mark Hahn
2001-05-23 14:59       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-23 15:39 ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0105231022060.1874-100000@freak.distro.conectiva \
    --to=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox