From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 11:58:04 -0300 (BRST)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: suspend processes at load (was Re: a simple OOM ...) 
In-Reply-To: <utdudtoacmbjrmtcp0v1auga63b9rf8ccf@4ax.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0104201157500.1685-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
To: "James A.Sutherland" <jas88@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Dave McCracken <dmc@austin.ibm.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>

On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, James A.Sutherland wrote:

> No problem - the OOM killer itself had similar origins, in fact! (Back
> in the heat of the "Avoiding OOM on overcommit" flamewar, I suggested
> the original concept, which evolved into the OOM killer we have now)

What year was that ?  ;)

Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

		http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/	http://distro.conectiva.com.br/

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/