linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
To: Matthew Kirkwood <matthew@hairy.beasts.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Mike Galbraith <mikeg@wen-online.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.2 vs 2.4 for PostgreSQL
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 17:56:10 -0300 (BRT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103061742500.852-100000@freak.distro.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103061626070.20708-100000@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com>

On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Matthew Kirkwood wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have been collecting some postgres benchmark numbers
> on various kernels, which may be of interest to this
> list.
> 
> The test was to run "pgbench" with various numbers of
> clients against postgresql 7.1beta4.  The benchmark
> looks rather like a fairly minimal TPC/B, with lots of
> small transactions, all committed.  It's not very
> complex, but does produce pretty stable numbers, and
> appears capable of showing up performance improvements
> or deteriorations.

Very nice.

<snip>

> Invitations:
>  * Anyone care to suggest any patches/configuration tweaks/
>    &c, which might prove an interesting test?  Are there
>    significant elevator/VM differences between 2.4.2ac and
>    2.4.3pre?

Yes, there are significant VM differenteces between Linus tree and -ac.

I'll try to setup the environment for this benchmark today on one of our
(working) test boxes. 

Thanks


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-03-06 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-06 19:36 Matthew Kirkwood
2001-03-06 20:39 ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-06 20:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2001-03-06 22:02 ` Matthew Kirkwood
2001-03-07  7:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-03-07 10:22 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-03-07 11:16   ` Matthew Kirkwood
2001-03-07 12:07     ` Stephen C. Tweedie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0103061742500.852-100000@freak.distro.conectiva \
    --to=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthew@hairy.beasts.org \
    --cc=mikeg@wen-online.de \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox