From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
To: Matthew Kirkwood <matthew@hairy.beasts.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Mike Galbraith <mikeg@wen-online.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.2 vs 2.4 for PostgreSQL
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 17:56:10 -0300 (BRT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103061742500.852-100000@freak.distro.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103061626070.20708-100000@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com>
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Matthew Kirkwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been collecting some postgres benchmark numbers
> on various kernels, which may be of interest to this
> list.
>
> The test was to run "pgbench" with various numbers of
> clients against postgresql 7.1beta4. The benchmark
> looks rather like a fairly minimal TPC/B, with lots of
> small transactions, all committed. It's not very
> complex, but does produce pretty stable numbers, and
> appears capable of showing up performance improvements
> or deteriorations.
Very nice.
<snip>
> Invitations:
> * Anyone care to suggest any patches/configuration tweaks/
> &c, which might prove an interesting test? Are there
> significant elevator/VM differences between 2.4.2ac and
> 2.4.3pre?
Yes, there are significant VM differenteces between Linus tree and -ac.
I'll try to setup the environment for this benchmark today on one of our
(working) test boxes.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-06 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-06 19:36 Matthew Kirkwood
2001-03-06 20:39 ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-06 20:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2001-03-06 22:02 ` Matthew Kirkwood
2001-03-07 7:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-03-07 10:22 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-03-07 11:16 ` Matthew Kirkwood
2001-03-07 12:07 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0103061742500.852-100000@freak.distro.conectiva \
--to=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthew@hairy.beasts.org \
--cc=mikeg@wen-online.de \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox