From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:16:15 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [highmem bug report against -test5 and -test6] Re: [PATCH] Re: simple FS application that hangs 2.4-test5, mem mgmt problem or FS buffer cache mgmt problem? (fwd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Ingo Molnar , linux-mm@kvack.org, "Stephen C. Tweedie" List-ID: On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 04:35:43PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > because we keep the buffer heads on active pages in memory... > > > > A page can be the most active and the VM and never need bh on it after the > > first pagein. Keeping the bh on it means wasting tons of memory for no good > > reason. > > I agree. Most of the time, there's absolutely no point in > keeping the buffer heads around. Most pages (and _especially_ > the actively mapped ones) do not need the buffer heads at all > after creation - once they are uptodate they stay uptodate and > we're only interested in the page, not the buffers used to > create it. I'll create a patch to do strip off the buffer heads from clean active pages. regards, Rik -- "What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!" -- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000 http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/ -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/