From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 17:19:31 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [PATCH] test5-pre1 vmfix (rev 8) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Roger Larsson , Linus Torvalds , "linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" List-ID: On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Roger Larsson wrote: > > > * I get 10% better throughput than 2.4.0-test4, YMMV > > Seeing about the same improvement here.. lightly tested. Part of the code looks bogus though. Linus, would it be possible to have a rule in place that nobody submits VM code unless they accompany it with an explanation of _why_ their code is supposed to work? There seem to be too many "random tweaks" in the current VM code where nobody has an explanation of why the code works and what exactly it is supposed to do... regards, Rik -- "What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!" -- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000 http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/ -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/