From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: "Juan J. Quintela" <quintela@fi.udc.es>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
Hans Reiser <hans@reiser.to>, bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Alexander Zarochentcev <zam@odintsovo.comcor.ru>
Subject: Re: journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot just the code)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 18:14:53 -0300 (BRST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006071808300.14304-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ytt1z29dxce.fsf@serpe.mitica>
On 7 Jun 2000, Juan J. Quintela wrote:
> >>>>> "sct" == Stephen C Tweedie <sct@redhat.com> writes:
>
> >> I'd like to be able to keep stuff simple in the shrink_mmap
> >> "equivalent" I'm working on. Something like:
> >>
> >> if (PageDirty(page) && page->mapping && page->mapping->flush)
> >> maxlaunder -= page->mapping->flush();
>
> sct> That looks ideal.
>
> But this is supposed to flush that _page_, at least in the
> normal case.
But not *just* that page ...
In the ideal case the flush() function will search around
memory for objects to cluster and write out together with
this page.
I'll probably write an example page->mapping->flush()
function for swap. The function will do the following:
- find other swap pages to cluster with this page,
those must be:
- contiguous with this page
- inactive or seldomly used active pages
- dirty (duh)
- flush out the collection of pages
- return the number of INACTIVE pages we flushed,
ignoring the number of active pages
That last point is very important because:
- if we mainly flushed active pages, we should not give
shrink_mmap (or similar) the illusion that we cleared
up the inactive list ... don't pretend we made a lot
of progress cleaning inactive pages if we didn't
- since we wrote the pages in the same disk seek, writing
the active pages was essentially for free so it doesn't
matter that we don't report having written them ...
(having written that page and potentially saving some IO
later, otoh, definately does matter)
regards,
Rik
--
The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network
of people. That is its real strength.
Wanna talk about the kernel? irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-06-07 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006060811120.15888-100000@dax.joh.cam.ac.uk>
[not found] ` <393CA40C.648D3261@reiser.to>
[not found] ` <20000606114851.A30672@home.ds9a.nl>
[not found] ` <393CBBB8.554A0D2A@reiser.to>
[not found] ` <20000606172606.I25794@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <393D37D1.1BC61DC3@reiser.to>
[not found] ` <20000606205447.T23701@redhat.com>
2000-06-06 23:06 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it's not " Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 1:19 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot " Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 1:46 ` Quintela Carreira Juan J.
2000-06-07 3:45 ` Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 11:15 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 13:23 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 13:41 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 14:27 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 14:46 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 14:51 ` bert hubert
2000-06-07 15:20 ` Quintela Carreira Juan J.
2000-06-07 15:35 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 15:41 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 15:44 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 17:10 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-06-07 17:14 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 17:21 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-06-07 20:16 ` Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 21:20 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 21:52 ` journaling & VM Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 22:11 ` James Sutherland
2000-06-07 22:29 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-08 1:11 ` Neil Schemenauer
2000-06-08 1:29 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 20:16 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot just the code) Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 20:54 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 21:29 ` Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 21:31 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 21:33 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 22:20 ` journaling & VM Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 21:50 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot just the code) Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 19:02 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel:it'snot " Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 13:40 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot " Chris Mason
2000-06-07 13:47 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 11:12 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 16:35 ` journaling & VM John Fremlin
2000-06-07 17:11 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
[not found] ` <20000608114435.A15433@uni-koblenz.de>
2000-06-08 21:29 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-09 11:53 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-06-07 17:48 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot just the code) Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 18:01 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 19:58 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 20:56 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 21:14 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2000-06-07 21:24 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 21:40 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 21:49 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 22:00 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 22:22 ` Manfred Spraul
2000-06-09 15:08 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-09 16:52 ` Manfred Spraul
2000-06-09 17:23 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-09 18:26 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel:it'snot " Manfred Spraul
2000-06-07 22:28 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot " Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 10:10 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it's not " Stephen C. Tweedie
[not found] ` <393DACC8.5DB60A81@reiser.to>
2000-06-07 11:00 ` reiserfs being part of the kernel: it's not just the code Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 17:11 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 17:13 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 17:46 ` Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 19:53 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0006071808300.14304-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva \
--to=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=ahu@ds9a.nl \
--cc=hans@reiser.to \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
--cc=quintela@fi.udc.es \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=zam@odintsovo.comcor.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox