linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: "Quintela Carreira Juan J." <quintela@fi.udc.es>,
	Hans Reiser <hans@reiser.to>, bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Alexander Zarochentcev <zam@odintsovo.comcor.ru>
Subject: Re: journaling & VM  (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot just the code)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 12:41:23 -0300 (BRST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006071239120.14304-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000607163519.S30951@redhat.com>

On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 05:20:41PM +0200, Quintela Carreira Juan J. wrote:
> > 
> > stephen> It doesn't matter.  *If* the filesystem knows better than the 
> > stephen> page cleaner what progress can be made, then let the filesystem
> > stephen> make progress where it can.  There are likely to be transaction
> > stephen> dependencies which mean we have to clean some pages in a specific
> > stephen> order.  As soon as the page cleaner starts exerting back pressure
> > stephen> on the filesystem, the filesystem needs to start clearing stuff,
> > stephen> and if that means we have to start cleaning things that shrink_
> > stephen> mmap didn't expect us to, then that's fine.
> > 
> > I don't like that, if you put some page in the LRU cache, that means
> > that you think that _this_ page is freeable.
> 
> Remember that Rik is talking about multiple LRUs.  Pages can
> only be on the inactive LRU if they are clean and unpinned, yes,
> but we still need a way of tracking pages which are in a more
> difficult state.

That's the scavenge list ;)

The inactive list contains unmapped pages with age 0, from
the inactive list I want to clean the pages whenever there's
demand for memory.

This could potentially mean that the pinned buffers from one
fs would be spread over both the active and the inactive list.

> > If you need pages in the LRU cache only for getting notifications,
> > then change the system to send notifications each time that we are
> > short of memory.
> 
> It's a matter of pressure.  The filesystem with most pages in
> the LRU cache, or with the oldest pages there, should stand the
> greatest chance of being the first one told to clean up its act.

Indeed, the more I think of it the more I think any other
approach than shared-lru is the right one.

regards,

Rik
--
The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network
of people. That is its real strength.

Wanna talk about the kernel?  irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies
http://www.conectiva.com/		http://www.surriel.com/

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-06-07 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006060811120.15888-100000@dax.joh.cam.ac.uk>
     [not found] ` <393CA40C.648D3261@reiser.to>
     [not found]   ` <20000606114851.A30672@home.ds9a.nl>
     [not found]     ` <393CBBB8.554A0D2A@reiser.to>
     [not found]       ` <20000606172606.I25794@redhat.com>
     [not found]         ` <393D37D1.1BC61DC3@reiser.to>
     [not found]           ` <20000606205447.T23701@redhat.com>
2000-06-06 23:06             ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it's not " Rik van Riel
2000-06-07  1:19               ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot " Hans Reiser
2000-06-07  1:46                 ` Quintela Carreira Juan J.
2000-06-07  3:45                   ` Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 11:15                     ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 13:23                       ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 13:41                         ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 14:27                           ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 14:46                             ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 14:51                               ` bert hubert
2000-06-07 15:20                               ` Quintela Carreira Juan J.
2000-06-07 15:35                                 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 15:41                                   ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2000-06-07 15:44                                   ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 17:10                                   ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-06-07 17:14                                     ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 17:21                                       ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-06-07 20:16                                   ` Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 21:20                                     ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 21:52                                       ` journaling & VM Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 22:11                                         ` James Sutherland
2000-06-07 22:29                                           ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-08  1:11                                         ` Neil Schemenauer
2000-06-08  1:29                                           ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 20:16                                 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot just the code) Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 20:54                                   ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 21:29                                     ` Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 21:31                                       ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 21:33                                       ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 22:20                                         ` journaling & VM Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 21:50                                       ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot just the code) Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 19:02                         ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel:it'snot " Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 13:40                       ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot " Chris Mason
2000-06-07 13:47                         ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 11:12                 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 16:35                   ` journaling & VM John Fremlin
2000-06-07 17:11                     ` Stephen C. Tweedie
     [not found]                       ` <20000608114435.A15433@uni-koblenz.de>
2000-06-08 21:29                         ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-09 11:53                           ` Ralf Baechle
2000-06-07 17:48                   ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot just the code) Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 18:01                     ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 19:58                       ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 20:56                         ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 21:14                           ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 21:24                           ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 21:40                             ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 21:49                               ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 22:00                                 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 22:22                                 ` Manfred Spraul
2000-06-09 15:08                                   ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-09 16:52                                     ` Manfred Spraul
2000-06-09 17:23                                       ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-09 18:26                                         ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel:it'snot " Manfred Spraul
2000-06-07 22:28                                 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot " Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 10:10               ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it's not " Stephen C. Tweedie
     [not found]             ` <393DACC8.5DB60A81@reiser.to>
2000-06-07 11:00               ` reiserfs being part of the kernel: it's not just the code Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 17:11                 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 17:13                   ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 17:46                 ` Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 19:53                   ` Stephen C. Tweedie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0006071239120.14304-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva \
    --to=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=ahu@ds9a.nl \
    --cc=hans@reiser.to \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mason@suse.com \
    --cc=quintela@fi.udc.es \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=zam@odintsovo.comcor.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox