From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: Hans Reiser <hans@reiser.to>, bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it's not just the code)
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 20:06:38 -0300 (BRST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006061956360.7328-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000606205447.T23701@redhat.com>
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> It wasn't a journaling API we were talking about for this. The
> problem is much more central to the VM than that --- basically,
> the VM currently assumes that any existing page can be evicted
> from memory with very little extra work. It just isn't prepared
> for the situation that you have with transactions,
> journaling itself, but the transactional requirements which are
> the problem --- basically the VM cannot do _anything_ about
> individual pages which are pinned by a transaction, but rather
> we need a way to trigger a filesystem flush, AND to prevent more
> dirtying of pages by the filesystem (these are two distinct
> problems), or we just lock up under load on lower memory boxes.
This is especially tricky in the case of a large mmap()ed
file. We'll have to restrict the maximum number of read-write
mapped pages from such a file in order to keep the system
stable...
(try mmap002 from quintela's MM test suite with a journaling
FS for a nice change...)
> A reservation API which lets all transactional filesystems
> reserve the right to dirty a certain number of pages in advance
> of actually needing them is really needed to avoid such lockups.
> The reservation call can stall if the memory limit has been
> reached, providing flow control to the filesystem; and a
> notification list can start committing and flushing older
> transactions when that happens.
Indeed we need this. Since I seem to be coordinating the VM
changes at the moment anyway, I'd love to work together with
the journaling folks on solving this problem...
It will require some changes in the page fault path and some
other areas...
regards,
Rik
--
The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network
of people. That is its real strength.
Wanna talk about the kernel? irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
next parent reply other threads:[~2000-06-06 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006060811120.15888-100000@dax.joh.cam.ac.uk>
[not found] ` <393CA40C.648D3261@reiser.to>
[not found] ` <20000606114851.A30672@home.ds9a.nl>
[not found] ` <393CBBB8.554A0D2A@reiser.to>
[not found] ` <20000606172606.I25794@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <393D37D1.1BC61DC3@reiser.to>
[not found] ` <20000606205447.T23701@redhat.com>
2000-06-06 23:06 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2000-06-07 1:19 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot " Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 1:46 ` Quintela Carreira Juan J.
2000-06-07 3:45 ` Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 11:15 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 13:23 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 13:41 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 14:27 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 14:46 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 14:51 ` bert hubert
2000-06-07 15:20 ` Quintela Carreira Juan J.
2000-06-07 15:35 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 15:41 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 15:44 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 17:10 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-06-07 17:14 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 17:21 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2000-06-07 20:16 ` Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 21:20 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 21:52 ` journaling & VM Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 22:11 ` James Sutherland
2000-06-07 22:29 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-08 1:11 ` Neil Schemenauer
2000-06-08 1:29 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 20:16 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot just the code) Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 20:54 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 21:29 ` Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 21:31 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 21:33 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 22:20 ` journaling & VM Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 21:50 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot just the code) Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 19:02 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel:it'snot " Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 13:40 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot " Chris Mason
2000-06-07 13:47 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 11:12 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 16:35 ` journaling & VM John Fremlin
2000-06-07 17:11 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
[not found] ` <20000608114435.A15433@uni-koblenz.de>
2000-06-08 21:29 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-09 11:53 ` Ralf Baechle
2000-06-07 17:48 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot just the code) Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 18:01 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 19:58 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 20:56 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 21:14 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 21:24 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 21:40 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 21:49 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 22:00 ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-06-07 22:22 ` Manfred Spraul
2000-06-09 15:08 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-09 16:52 ` Manfred Spraul
2000-06-09 17:23 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-09 18:26 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel:it'snot " Manfred Spraul
2000-06-07 22:28 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it'snot " Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 10:10 ` journaling & VM (was: Re: reiserfs being part of the kernel: it's not " Stephen C. Tweedie
[not found] ` <393DACC8.5DB60A81@reiser.to>
2000-06-07 11:00 ` reiserfs being part of the kernel: it's not just the code Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 17:11 ` Rik van Riel
2000-06-07 17:13 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-06-07 17:46 ` Hans Reiser
2000-06-07 19:53 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0006061956360.7328-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva \
--to=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=ahu@ds9a.nl \
--cc=hans@reiser.to \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox