linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan <ananth@sgi.com>,
	Kanoj Sarcar <kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Oops in __free_pages_ok (pre7-1) (Long) (backtrace)
Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 16:00:55 -0300 (BRST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005041559490.23740-100000@duckman.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10005041137320.1388-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>

On Thu, 4 May 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> Note that changing how hard try_to_free_pages() tries to free a page is
> exactly part of what Rik has been doing, so this is something that has
> changed recently. It's not trivial to get right, for a very simple reason:
> we need to balance the "hardness" between the VM area scanning and the RLU
> list scanning.

With the current scheme, it's pretty much impossible to get it
right.

> Rik probably balanced it ok, but ended up making it too soft,
> giving up much too easily even when memory really would be
> available if it were to just try a bit harder..

*nod*

I hope the active/inactive page list scheme will fix this.

(we can push harder since we'll have pages in every stage
of aging every time)

regards,

Rik
--
The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network
of people. That is its real strength.

Wanna talk about the kernel?  irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies
http://www.conectiva.com/		http://www.surriel.com/

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-05-04 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <8ener4$6djpb$1@fido.engr.sgi.com>
2000-05-03  3:11 ` Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan
2000-05-03  3:47   ` Linus Torvalds
2000-05-03  5:26     ` Kanoj Sarcar
2000-05-03  6:22       ` Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan
2000-05-03 16:11         ` Kanoj Sarcar
2000-05-03 16:19           ` Linus Torvalds
2000-05-03 16:35             ` Kanoj Sarcar
2000-05-03 17:16               ` Linus Torvalds
2000-05-03 17:31                 ` Kanoj Sarcar
2000-05-03 18:17                   ` Linus Torvalds
2000-05-03 18:37                     ` Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan
2000-05-03 18:37                     ` Kanoj Sarcar
2000-05-03 19:41                       ` Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan
2000-05-03 21:28                     ` Jeff Garzik
2000-05-03  8:11       ` Linus Torvalds
2000-05-03  8:31         ` Linus Torvalds
2000-05-03 16:08           ` Kanoj Sarcar
2000-05-03 16:14             ` Linus Torvalds
2000-05-03 16:24               ` Kanoj Sarcar
2000-05-04  1:38             ` Linus Torvalds
2000-05-04  2:44               ` Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan
2000-05-04  4:05                 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-05-04  3:16               ` Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan
2000-05-04  4:10                 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-05-05  4:46                   ` Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan
2000-05-04  7:42               ` Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan
2000-05-04 15:33                 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-05-04 15:57                   ` Rik van Riel
2000-05-04 17:19                   ` Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan
2000-05-04 17:41                     ` Rik van Riel
2000-05-04 18:18                       ` Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan
2000-05-04 18:43                         ` Linus Torvalds
2000-05-04 19:00                           ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2000-05-04 19:17                             ` Linus Torvalds
2000-05-04 21:16                               ` Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan
2000-05-04 21:51                                 ` Rik van Riel
2000-05-04 22:21                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-05-05  0:47                                   ` 7-4 VM killing (A solution) Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan
2000-05-05  1:30                                     ` Rik van Riel
2000-05-05  1:47                                       ` Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan
2000-05-05  5:13                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2000-05-05  6:44                                       ` Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan
2000-05-05  6:51                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2000-05-05 10:23                                           ` Rik van Riel
2000-05-04 20:40                   ` Oops in __free_pages_ok (pre7-1) (Long) (backtrace) Roger Larsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0005041559490.23740-100000@duckman.conectiva \
    --to=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=ananth@sgi.com \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@nl.linux.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox