From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 01:26:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [patch] take 2 Re: PG_swap_entry bug in recent kernels In-Reply-To: <200004072012.NAA10407@google.engr.sgi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Kanoj Sarcar Cc: Ben LaHaise , riel@nl.linux.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Kanoj Sarcar wrote: >[..] you should try stress >testing with swapdevice removal with a large number of runnable >processes.[..] swapdevice removal during swapin activity is broken right now as far I can see. I'm trying to fix that stuff right now. >Also, did you have a good reason to want to make lookup_swap_cache() >invoke find_get_page(), and not find_lock_page()? I coded some of the Using find_lock_page and then unlocking the page is meaningless. If you are going to unconditionally unlock the page then you shouldn't lock it in first place. Andrea -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/