linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Linux responsiveness under heavy load
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 19:26:22 -0300 (BRST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0003081920500.4639-100000@duckman.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000308223851.A9519@pcep-jamie.cern.ch>

On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Jamie Lokier wrote:

	[snip awful performance under load]
> A larger boost to keep-the-page-in-memory priority for pages
> referenced by "interactive" processes might be in order.  
> Either faster vmscanning simply a higher priority for pages
> found to be used.  Might not be too hard to implement either.

Indeed it shouldn't be. Having a two-phase NRU unmapping in the
page table scanning and a maybe better LRU reclamation in
shrink_mmap() may help here, but the CPU cost may put some
people off...

Then again, not having this better memory reclamation is probably
more expensive than having it :)

Now where did I put that asbestos underwear?

> A larger priority for page-in I/O due to interactive process too
> might help too.  Some modification of Andrea's elevator.  But
> that doesn't seem so easy.

Read requests are easily tied to a process, so this could
be relatively easy. Doing it properly before 2.5 may be a
little difficult though ...

regards,

Rik
--
The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network
of people. That is its real strength.

http://www.conectiva.com/		http://www.surriel.com/

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

       reply	other threads:[~2000-03-08 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20000308223851.A9519@pcep-jamie.cern.ch>
2000-03-08 22:26 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2000-03-08 22:39   ` Jamie Lokier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0003081920500.4639-100000@duckman.conectiva \
    --to=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=riel@nl.linux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox