From: James Simmons <jsimmons@edgeglobal.com>
To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: MMIO regions
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 13:57:50 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9910111354090.20596-100000@imperial.edgeglobal.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14338.6581.988257.647691@dukat.scot.redhat.com>
> You seem to be looking for a solution which doesn't exist, though. :)
Well my next experiment is RTLinux with acceleration. From what I have
been learning SGI kernel has a special schedular for its graphics to
ensure hard real time performace. I want to see how much of a impact
RTLinux wil have with acceleration.
> It is an unfortunate, but true, fact that the broken video hardware
> doesn't let you provide memory mapped access which is (a) fast, (b)
> totally safe, and (c) functional. Choose which of a, b and c you are
> willing to sacrifice and then we can look for solutions. DRI sacrifices
> (b), for example, by making the locking cooperative rather than
> compulsory. The basic unaccelerated fbcon sacrifices (c). Using VM
> protection would sacrifice (a). It's not the ideal choice, sadly.
Well I see SGI uses usemsa which is its version of flocking. If SGI does
it then its the right way :) Yes I think SGI hardware is teh greatest in
the world.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://humbolt.geo.uu.nl/Linux-MM/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-10-11 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-10-04 14:38 James Simmons
1999-10-04 15:31 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-04 15:52 ` James Simmons
1999-10-04 16:02 ` Benjamin C.R. LaHaise
1999-10-04 17:27 ` James Simmons
1999-10-04 17:56 ` Benjamin C.R. LaHaise
1999-10-04 18:26 ` James Simmons
1999-10-04 19:19 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-06 20:15 ` James Simmons
1999-10-11 17:09 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-11 17:26 ` Jeff Garzik
1999-10-11 23:14 ` James Simmons
1999-10-11 17:57 ` James Simmons [this message]
1999-10-04 16:11 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-04 18:29 ` James Simmons
1999-10-04 19:35 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-07 19:40 ` James Simmons
1999-10-10 11:24 ` Rik Faith
1999-10-10 14:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
1999-10-10 18:46 ` Rik Faith
1999-10-11 0:21 ` James Simmons
1999-10-11 10:59 ` Rik Faith
1999-10-11 3:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
1999-10-10 14:21 ` James Simmons
1999-10-11 17:22 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-04 16:58 ` Marcus Sundberg
1999-10-04 18:27 ` James Simmons
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.10.9910111354090.20596-100000@imperial.edgeglobal.com \
--to=jsimmons@edgeglobal.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox