linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Sutherland <jas88@cam.ac.uk>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Ingo Oeser <ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Discussion on my OOM killer API
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 00:58:44 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010270056590.11273-100000@dax.joh.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010261857580.15696-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>

On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > > I'm also willing to maintain it ;-)
> > > 
> > > Linus, how would you feel about an interface that allows
> > > people to insomd/rmmod their own OOM handler ?
> > 
> > I hate the idea.
> 
> *grin*
> 
> I agree with that, except for one small point...

I agree too: if we're out of memory hard enough to trigger the in-kernel
handler, blowing away almost anything would be an improvement. Ideally,
action should be taken by userspace long before this point...

> > I dislike that kind of approach in general. I don't like plug-in
> > schedulers, etc either. I think it's a cop-out, saying that we
> > cannot do a good enough job, and claiming that it's such a
> > difficult problem that we should let the user decide.
> 
> ... the generic OOM killer we have in the system right now
> should do a good job in most of the cases, but I've heard
> from a number of people who would like to have the OOM killer
> do something "special" for their system.
> 
> For instance, they want to have student programs killed before
> staff programs, or want to be able to specify some priveledged
> processes that will never be killed (or do other things that
> we probably don't want to have in the generic killer).
> 
> > In short, it's one of those things that sounds like a good idea,
> > but that results in absolute crap in the end.
> 
> Sure, but the idea is to keep this absolute crap out of
> the kernel and local to the systems where people need
> to replace the OOM killer because of special reasons ;)

Which begs the question, where did the userspace OOM policy daemon go? It,
coupled with Rik's simple in-kernel last-ditch handler, should cover most
eventualities without the need for nasty kernel kludges.


James.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-10-26 23:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20001019122331.H840@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de>
2000-10-19 17:02 ` Rik van Riel
2000-10-26 20:47   ` Linus Torvalds
2000-10-26 21:16     ` Rik van Riel
2000-10-26 22:33       ` Mark Hahn
2000-10-26 23:58       ` James Sutherland [this message]
2000-10-27  0:10         ` Linus Torvalds
2000-10-27  6:46           ` James Sutherland
2000-10-27  7:39             ` Gábor Lénárt
2000-10-27 13:54               ` James Sutherland
2000-10-27 17:10         ` Ingo Oeser
2000-10-27 17:36           ` James Sutherland
2000-10-27 22:12             ` jfm2
2000-10-27 22:11               ` James Sutherland
2000-10-27 22:43                 ` jfm2
2000-10-27 22:51                   ` James Sutherland
2000-10-28  4:48                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2000-10-28  7:29                   ` James Sutherland
2000-10-30  9:02               ` G?bor L?n?rt
2000-10-30  9:41                 ` James Sutherland
2000-10-30  9:53                   ` G?bor L?n?rt
2000-10-30 12:18                     ` J.A. Sutherland
2000-10-29 19:30             ` Ingo Oeser
2000-10-29 20:41               ` James Sutherland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.10.10010270056590.11273-100000@dax.joh.cam.ac.uk \
    --to=jas88@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox