linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Colombo <marco@esi.it>
To: Jan Astalos <astalos@tuke.sk>
Cc: Linux MM mailing list <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: Question: memory management and QoS
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:42:32 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10008301307330.4238-100000@NOC.ESI> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39ACCD6F.37EAA614@tuke.sk>

On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Jan Astalos wrote:

> Andrey Savochkin wrote:
> [snip]
> 
> > > As a user, I won't bear _any_ overcommits at all. Once service is paid, I expect
> > > guarantied level of quality. In the case of VM, all the memory I paid for.
> > > For all of my processes.
> > 
> > It means that you pay orders of magnitude more for it.
> 
> If I got it right you are speaking about disk space. About sum of disk quotas
> "orders of magnitude" higher than actual available disk space, right ?
> You will sell users more disk space than you have for the price of your
> actual space (and you'll hope that they won't use whole disk).
> 
> But you must get the disk space when users will need it (QoS), so in disk shortage,
> you'll need to buy next one. You'll then send an additional bill to them ?

Well, IMHO it's a matter of numbers. If you're going to use 1/2 of the
system resources, you may afford the cost of a whole dedicated system.
No quotas, no users, no problems.
If you're going to use 1/1000 of them (so we're speaking of a huge system)
you may consider that, on average, no all users will be using their 
resources, and it makes a lot of sense to overcommit.
If all citizens in a big town want to use their phone at the same time,
most of them won't get the service. But it almost never happens.
The bigger the numbers involved, the safer to overcommit. It allows the
service provider to lower costs a lot. I think no one is selling a 
phone line that is garanteed to *always* work (it works only for p-o-p links,
i.e. leased lines). It would cost too much, and, in practice, give no real
advantage... 
That's the whole idea behind time(and resource)-sharing systems...
Otherwise, that 1/1000 of the huge system will cost *much* more than
a personal workstation with better performances. And also you'll see
other users, paying 1/100 of what you're paying, get almost the same
service (the system almost never fails to fulfill their requests).

And you're not selling "more disk space than you have". You're selling
10MB and the user gets up to 10MB. Shortage *almost* never happens,
so you *almost* always provide the service...

.TM.
-- 
      ____/  ____/   /
     /      /       /			Marco Colombo
    ___/  ___  /   /		      Technical Manager
   /          /   /			 ESI s.r.l.
 _____/ _____/  _/		       Colombo@ESI.it

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-08-30 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-08-25 13:22 Yuri Pudgorodsky
2000-08-25 15:51 ` Jan Astalos
2000-08-25 20:17   ` Yuri Pudgorodsky
2000-08-28  8:36     ` Jan Astalos
2000-08-28 11:05       ` Andrey Savochkin
2000-08-28 12:10         ` Jan Astalos
2000-08-28 13:10           ` Andrey Savochkin
2000-08-30  9:01             ` Jan Astalos
2000-08-30 11:42               ` Marco Colombo [this message]
2000-08-28 17:40           ` Rik van Riel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-08-24 10:13 Jan Astalos
2000-08-28  7:47 ` Andrey Savochkin
2000-08-28  9:28   ` Jan Astalos
2000-08-28 11:30     ` Andrey Savochkin
2000-08-28 12:38       ` Jan Astalos
2000-08-28 17:25     ` Rik van Riel
2000-08-30  7:38       ` Jan Astalos
2000-08-30 16:53         ` Rik van Riel
2000-08-31  1:48           ` Andrey Savochkin
2000-08-31 11:49           ` Jan Astalos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.10.10008301307330.4238-100000@NOC.ESI \
    --to=marco@esi.it \
    --cc=astalos@tuke.sk \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox