From: Stelios Xanthakis <root@ppp-pat135.tee.gr>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Stack syscall is here
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 05:14:42 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1000617050450.328A-100000@ppp-pat135.tee.gr> (raw)
Hi,
A while ago we were discussing possible ways to shrink the stack segment
of a process. A solution was to read the base of the stack segment from
/proc/self/maps and explictly unmap part of the unused stack (unused stack
is esp - vm_start).
This is a *hack*. Unmapping something maintained by the kernel is
definately a hack and has no future in serious portable applications.
I had free time recently and I wrote & tested a new system call,
adjstack().
adjstack (void *sp, size_t max_unused)
will find the stack area (VM_GROWSDOWN) which includes <sp> and release part
of the unused stack with respect to <max_unused>.
Please see the man page (which possibly needs corrections):
http://students.ceid.upatras.gr/~sxanth/lst/ADJSTACK.1
or
http://students.ceid.upatras.gr/~sxanth/lst/ADJSTACK.txt
Do we need Yet Another Syscall ?
If people start using more of the stack segment for temporary allocations
with alloca(), the world will be a better place to live!
Much less fragmentation and less work for the kernel -- but a way to shrink
extreme stack bursts will have to be there.
The code is terribly small and can be found at:
http://students.ceid.upatras.gr/~sxanth/lst/adjstack.c
I didn't want to give Yet Another Patch which will mess with unistd.h so
adjstack.c is just the system call code which I include to mmap.c.
It is tested with 2.2.x kernel and works fine.
For >= 2.3.x kernels adjstack will use madvise with MADV_DONTNEED instead of
munmap, but I did not test that. It would be interesting to see the better
performance in the 2.4.x series.
Tests were done for x86. Is the code generic indeed (HP PA?).
A sample test program at:
http://studens.ceid.upatras.gr/~sxanth/lst/padjstack.c
Is a multithreaded application in which threads call a function foo () that
allocates temporary space with alloca() using a Reyleigh-like distribution
for the size of the allocated space. adjstack is called after every call to
this foo () function to /possibly/ shrink the stack.
It works Ok, but more experienced kernel hackers will have to look at the
lock_kernel() and friends.
On the other hand, adjstack can serve as a sample of how could we manage
the stack according to the application's directives.
Cheers
Stelios
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
reply other threads:[~2000-06-17 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.3.95.1000617050450.328A-100000@ppp-pat135.tee.gr \
--to=root@ppp-pat135.tee.gr \
--cc=axanth@tee.gr \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox