From: Rik van Riel <H.H.vanRiel@fys.ruu.nl>
To: "Dr. Werner Fink" <werner@suse.de>
Cc: sct@dcs.ed.ac.uk, torvalds@transmeta.com, blah@kvack.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [uPATCH] small kswapd improvement ???
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 16:33:46 +0100 (MET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.980304162522.24591A-100000@mirkwood.dummy.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199803041400.PAA06227@boole.fs100.suse.de>
On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
> Maybe that's the reason why the bigger initial age for swapped in pages gives
> an improvement in 2.0.33 ... it's a ``better protection'' for often needed
> pages.
I think I'm going to try a more LRU like aging algorithm
now. (I've worked with some SGI boxes at school, and it
looks like they're less phrone to trashing)
Algorithm:
age_page(page) {
page->age >>= 1;
}
touch_page(page) {
page->age >>= 1;
page->age |= 0x80;
}
and in vmscan.c/filemap.c:
- if (page->age)
+ if (page->age < 1 << (MIN_SWAP_AGE + (nr_free_pages < free_pages_low
? 1 : 0))
Then we could use the MIN_SWAP_AGE sysctl variable
to control the CPU usage / swap 'precision' of
kswapd. Even better would be a dynamic adjusment,
so kswapd would:
- never use more than 5% CPU (over a 10 sec interval?)
- use the maximum precision possible
- scan a maximum of MIN_SWAP_AGE + 2 times the number of
pages it frees
Rik.
+-----------------------------+------------------------------+
| For Linux mm-patches, go to | "I'm busy managing memory.." |
| my homepage (via LinuxHQ). | H.H.vanRiel@fys.ruu.nl |
| ...submissions welcome... | http://www.fys.ruu.nl/~riel/ |
+-----------------------------+------------------------------+
prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-03-04 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-03-03 17:05 Rik van Riel
1998-03-03 19:09 ` Rik van Riel
1998-03-03 23:54 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-03-03 23:59 ` Rik van Riel
1998-03-04 1:17 ` Benjamin C.R. LaHaise
1998-03-04 11:54 ` Rik van Riel
1998-03-04 21:11 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-03-04 23:27 ` Rik van Riel
1998-03-04 14:00 ` Dr. Werner Fink
1998-03-04 15:33 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.3.91.980304162522.24591A-100000@mirkwood.dummy.home \
--to=h.h.vanriel@fys.ruu.nl \
--cc=blah@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sct@dcs.ed.ac.uk \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=werner@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox