From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 19:34:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro Subject: Re: inode/dentry pressure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Rik van Riel Cc: Ben LaHaise , linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar List-ID: On Wed, 16 May 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > If we cannot find an easy to implement Real Solution(tm) we > should probably go for the 10% limit in 2.4 and implement the > real solution in 2.5; if anybody has a 2.4-attainable idea > I'd like to hear about it ;) Rip the crap from icache hard, fast and often. _Any_ inode with no dentry is fair game as soon as it's clean. Keep in mind that icache is a secondary cache - we are talking about the stuff dcache didn't want to keep. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/