linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <cel@monkey.org>
To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: possible brw_page optimization
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 13:50:23 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.10.10001271342110.20668-100000@funky.monkey.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14479.33307.9093.845257@dukat.scot.redhat.com>

On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 11:02:37 -0500 (EST), Chuck Lever <cel@monkey.org>
> said:
> > however, somehow i'd have to guarantee that all buffers associated with a
> > page that is to be compressed/encrypted are read/written at once.  
> 
> Why?  The swapper already does per-page IO locking, so you are protected
> against any conflicts while a page is being written out.

it's not a locking issue. the encryption algorithm is a block cipher on
the whole page. in order to decrypt a page, you need to be sure you have
all the pieces.  you can't read parts of the page and decrypt them.

forgetting about encryption for a moment, you don't think the optimization
is useful in the general case?  it's hardly ever used, if at all; plus it
seems to introduce some bugs.  that code would be a lot cleaner without
all the bother.  the "common case," by far, is to read/write the whole
page.

	- Chuck Lever
--
corporate:	<chuckl@netscape.com>
personal:	<chucklever@netscape.net> or <cel@monkey.org>

The Linux Scalability project:
	http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/linux-scalability/

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-01-27 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-01-21 20:21 Chuck Lever
2000-01-26 13:01 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-01-26 16:02   ` Chuck Lever
2000-01-26 23:24     ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-01-27 18:50       ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2000-01-27 19:52         ` Stephen C. Tweedie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.BSO.4.10.10001271342110.20668-100000@funky.monkey.org \
    --to=cel@monkey.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox