From: Chuck Lever <cel@monkey.org>
To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: possible brw_page optimization
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 11:02:37 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.10.10001261054300.27169-100000@funky.monkey.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14478.61468.943623.938788@dukat.scot.redhat.com>
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:21:33 -0500 (EST), Chuck Lever <cel@monkey.org>
> said:
> > i've been exploring swap compaction and encryption, and found that
> > brw_page wants to break pages into buffer-sized pieces in order to
> > schedule I/O.
>
> brw_page is there explicitly to perform physical block IO to disk. If
> you want to do compression or encription, I'd have thought you want to
> do that at a higher level.
yes, i want to make the policy decisions and do the encryption at the
rw_swap_page_base() level. the decryption/decompression would be handled
by the exit routine.
however, somehow i'd have to guarantee that all buffers associated with a
page that is to be compressed/encrypted are read/written at once. using a
bounce page to handle the ciphertext/compressed page might be enough to do
that, since it would have no buffers already associated with it.
however, i was wondering if the optimization i did was of general use. as
i mentioned, i don't see any place that invokes brw_page() in such a way
as to trigger the logic to read only some of the buffers.
> The clean way to do this would be to provide
> a virtual file to swap over, and to allow rw_swap_page_base() to pass
> the page read or write to that file's inode's read_/write_page methods.
> Then you can do any munging you want on the virtual swap file without
> polluting the underlying swap IO code.
using a unique swap file/device makes it easy to tell when you need to
decrypt a page. :)
- Chuck Lever
--
corporate: <chuckl@netscape.com>
personal: <chucklever@netscape.net> or <cel@monkey.org>
The Linux Scalability project:
http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/linux-scalability/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-01-26 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-01-21 20:21 Chuck Lever
2000-01-26 13:01 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-01-26 16:02 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2000-01-26 23:24 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-01-27 18:50 ` Chuck Lever
2000-01-27 19:52 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.BSO.4.10.10001261054300.27169-100000@funky.monkey.org \
--to=cel@monkey.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox