From: Chuck Lever <cel@monkey.org>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: possible brw_page optimization
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:21:33 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.10.10001211508270.26216-100000@funky.monkey.org> (raw)
i've been exploring swap compaction and encryption, and found that
brw_page wants to break pages into buffer-sized pieces in order to
schedule I/O. the logic wants to eliminate unnecessary I/O requests, so
it checks each buffer to see if it is up to date; it doesn't schedule
reads for buffers that are already up to date. all buffers are scheduled
unconditionally during a write request.
for compaction or encryption, all buffers must be read in order to get the
whole page and decrypt or decompress it, so i'd like to make
brw_page(READ) read all buffers for a page unconditionally, just like
brw_page(WRITE). at first, i thought a simple flag could request this
change in behavior.
however, looking at brw_page's callers, brw_page(READ) in 2.3.39+ is only
invoked on fresh pages, so i can't see where it's possible to not read all
the buffers for a page in brw_page. seems like the following is a
potential common case optimization of brw_page, with no loss of
performance.
what issues am i missing?
int brw_page(int rw, struct page *page, kdev_t dev, int b[], int size)
{
struct buffer_head *head, *bh, *arr[MAX_BUF_PER_PAGE];
int block, nr = 0;
/*
* We pretty much rely on the page lock for this, because
* create_page_buffers() might sleep.
*/
if (!page->buffers)
create_page_buffers(rw, page, dev, b, size);
head = page->buffers;
bh = head;
do {
arr[nr++] = bh;
atomic_inc(&bh->b_count);
if (rw == WRITE ) {
block = *(b++);
if (!bh->b_blocknr)
bh->b_blocknr = block;
set_bit(BH_Uptodate, &bh->b_state);
set_bit(BH_Dirty, &bh->b_state);
}
bh = bh->b_this_page;
} while (bh != head);
ll_rw_block(rw, nr, arr);
if (rw == READ)
++current->maj_flt;
return 0;
}
- Chuck Lever
--
corporate: <chuckl@netscape.com>
personal: <chucklever@netscape.net> or <cel@monkey.org>
The Linux Scalability project:
http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/linux-scalability/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
next reply other threads:[~2000-01-21 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-01-21 20:21 Chuck Lever [this message]
2000-01-26 13:01 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-01-26 16:02 ` Chuck Lever
2000-01-26 23:24 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-01-27 18:50 ` Chuck Lever
2000-01-27 19:52 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.BSO.4.10.10001211508270.26216-100000@funky.monkey.org \
--to=cel@monkey.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox