linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Lowe <elowe@myrile.madriver.k12.oh.us>
To: Chris Evans <chris@scary.beasts.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.0test9 vm: disappointing streaming i/o under load
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 07:38:08 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10010110734570.38557-100000@myrile.madriver.k12.oh.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010110056230.7853-100000@ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk>

Hello,

> Finally got round to checking out 2.4.0test9.
> 
> Unfortunately, 2.4.0test9 exhibits poor streaming i/o performance when
> under a bit of memory pressure.
> 
> The test is this: boot with mem=32M, log onto GNOME and start xmms playing
> a big .wav ripped from a CD (this requires 100-200k read i/o per second).
> 
> Then, I start then kill netscape. I then started a find / and started
> gnumeric firing up at the same time.

Would you try setting /proc/sys/vm/page-cluster to 8 or 16 and let
me know the results?  I think one _part_ of the problem is that
when the swapper isn't agressive enough, it causes too much disk
thrashing which gets in the way of normal I/O... my experience
has been that with modern disks with 512K+ cache you have to
write in 64K clusters to get optimum throughput.

Eric


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-10-11 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200010090419.e994JQT09775@trampoline.thunk.org>
2000-10-10 20:53 ` Updated 2.4 TODO List Rik van Riel
2000-10-11  0:06   ` 2.4.0test9 vm: disappointing streaming i/o under load Chris Evans
2000-10-11 11:38     ` Eric Lowe [this message]
2000-10-11 20:59       ` Chris Evans
2000-10-11 22:10         ` Roger Larsson
2000-10-11 22:46           ` Chris Evans
2000-10-13 16:57             ` Rik van Riel
2000-10-11 18:38   ` Updated 2.4 TODO List tytso
2000-10-11 23:52     ` [RFC] atomic pte updates for x86 smp Ben LaHaise
2000-10-12  0:09       ` Linus Torvalds
2000-10-12  4:03         ` Benjamin C.R. LaHaise
2000-10-12  4:06           ` David S. Miller
2000-10-12  4:31             ` Cort Dougan
2000-10-12  4:37             ` Benjamin C.R. LaHaise
2000-10-12  6:42           ` Linus Torvalds
2000-10-12  8:13             ` Ingo Molnar
2000-10-12  8:56               ` David S. Miller
2000-10-12 10:05                 ` Ingo Molnar
2000-10-12 11:10                   ` Ingo Molnar
2000-10-12 15:10             ` Benjamin C.R. LaHaise

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.BSF.4.10.10010110734570.38557-100000@myrile.madriver.k12.oh.us \
    --to=elowe@myrile.madriver.k12.oh.us \
    --cc=chris@scary.beasts.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox