From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from funky.monkey.org (smtp@funky.monkey.org [152.160.231.196]) by kvack.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA02088 for ; Thu, 27 May 1999 15:55:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 15:55:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Chuck Lever Subject: Re: [PATCHES] In-Reply-To: <14156.58667.141026.238904@dukat.scot.redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 27 May 1999, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > However, this brings up another point: > > ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/sct/fs/misc/fsync-2.2.8-v5.diff > > is a set of diffs to fix fsync performance on 2.2. It fully implements > fsync and fdatasync, and applies the same optimisations to O_SYNC. It > uses per-inode dirty buffer lists. stephen - this patch appears to combine the "block allocation deadlock" patch with the original fsync reimplementation... correct? have you experienced and/or fixed the 5-second self-destruct problem i mentioned to you? - Chuck Lever -- corporate: personal: or The Linux Scalability project: http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/linux-scalability/ -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm my@address' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://humbolt.geo.uu.nl/Linux-MM/