From: "Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com" <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] mm/memory: fix folio_set_dirty() vs. folio_mark_dirty() in zap_pte_range()
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 08:49:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PUZPR04MB6316745B9234C3B5781AEA1381742@PUZPR04MB6316.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122171751.272074-1-david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
Without this fix, testing the latest exfat with xfstests, test cases generic/029
and generic/030 will fail.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org> On Behalf
> Of David Hildenbrand
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 1:18 AM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org; David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>; Ryan
> Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>; Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>;
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Subject: [PATCH v1] mm/memory: fix folio_set_dirty() vs. folio_mark_dirty() in
> zap_pte_range()
>
> The correct folio replacement for "set_page_dirty()" is
> "folio_mark_dirty()", not "folio_set_dirty()". Using the latter won't
> properly inform the FS using the dirty_folio() callback.
>
> This has been found by code inspection, but likely this can result in
> some real trouble when zapping dirty PTEs that point at clean pagecache
> folios.
>
> Reported-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> Closes:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2445cedb-61fb-422c-8bfb-caf0a2beed62@arm.com
> Fixes: c46265030b0f ("mm/memory: page_remove_rmap() ->
> folio_remove_rmap_pte()")
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> ---
> mm/memory.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 7e1f4849463aa..89bcae0b224d6 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct
> mmu_gather *tlb,
> delay_rmap = 0;
> if (!folio_test_anon(folio)) {
> if (pte_dirty(ptent)) {
> - folio_set_dirty(folio);
> + folio_mark_dirty(folio);
> if (tlb_delay_rmap(tlb)) {
> delay_rmap = 1;
> force_flush = 1;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-23 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-22 17:17 David Hildenbrand
2024-01-22 17:22 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-01-23 8:49 ` Yuezhang.Mo [this message]
2024-01-23 8:57 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PUZPR04MB6316745B9234C3B5781AEA1381742@PUZPR04MB6316.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com \
--to=yuezhang.mo@sony.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox