From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yb1-f197.google.com (mail-yb1-f197.google.com [209.85.219.197]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28796B026E for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 20:16:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-yb1-f197.google.com with SMTP id y12-v6so236026ybg.23 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 17:16:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-pu1apc01on0094.outbound.protection.outlook.com. [104.47.126.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n204-v6si12487684ybb.311.2018.11.01.17.16.06 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Nov 2018 17:16:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Dexuan Cui Subject: Will the recent memory leak fixes be backported to longterm kernels? Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 00:16:02 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Roman Gushchin , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kernel-team@fb.com" , Shakeel Butt , Michal Hocko , Johannes Weiner , Tejun Heo , Rik van Riel , Konstantin Khlebnikov , Matthew Wilcox Cc: "Stable@vger.kernel.org" Hi all, When debugging a memory leak issue (https://github.com/coreos/bugs/issues/2= 516) with v4.14.11-coreos, we noticed the same issue may have been fixed recentl= y by Roman in the latest mainline (i.e. Linus's master branch) according to comm= ent #7 of=20 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1792349, which lists t= hese patches (I'm not sure if the 5-patch list is complete): 010cb21d4ede math64: prevent double calculation of DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP() arg= uments f77d7a05670d mm: don't miss the last page because of round-off error d18bf0af683e mm: drain memcg stocks on css offlining 71cd51b2e1ca mm: rework memcg kernel stack accounting f3a2fccbce15 mm: slowly shrink slabs with a relatively small number of obje= cts Obviously at least some of the fixes are also needed in the longterm kernel= s like v4.14.y, but none of the 5 patches has the "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org" tag? I'm won= dering if these patches will be backported to the longterm kernels. BTW, the patches = are not in v4.19, but I suppose they will be in v4.19.1-rc1? Thanks, -- Dexuan