linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Song, Xiongwei" <Xiongwei.Song@windriver.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"sxwjean@me.com" <sxwjean@me.com>,
	"42.hyeyoo@gmail.com" <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: "cl@linux.com" <cl@linux.com>,
	"penberg@kernel.org" <penberg@kernel.org>,
	"rientjes@google.com" <rientjes@google.com>,
	"iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com" <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"roman.gushchin@linux.dev" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] Documentation: kernel-parameters: remove slab_max_order and noaliencache
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 05:18:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB51929C73CA26257742E7D1DDECBCA@PH0PR11MB5192.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f8e8e28-28d4-b0a4-11a8-639f78c319c3@suse.cz>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2023 8:03 PM
> To: Song, Xiongwei <Xiongwei.Song@windriver.com>; sxwjean@me.com;
> 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com; linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: cl@linux.com; penberg@kernel.org; rientjes@google.com; iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com;
> akpm@linux-foundation.org; roman.gushchin@linux.dev; corbet@lwn.net; linux-
> doc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: kernel-parameters: remove slab_max_order and
> noaliencache
> 
> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
> is safe.
> 
> On 11/26/23 08:25, Song, Xiongwei wrote:
> > Hi Vlastimil,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> >> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2023 7:24 PM
> >> To: sxwjean@me.com; 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com; linux-mm@kvack.org
> >> Cc: cl@linux.com; penberg@kernel.org; rientjes@google.com; iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com;
> >> akpm@linux-foundation.org; roman.gushchin@linux.dev; corbet@lwn.net; linux-
> >> doc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Song, Xiongwei
> >> <Xiongwei.Song@windriver.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: kernel-parameters: remove slab_max_order and
> >> noaliencache
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/22/23 15:36, sxwjean@me.com wrote:
> >> > From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
> >> >
> >> > Since slab allocator has already been removed. There is no users about
> >> > slab_max_order and noaliencache, so let's remove them.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > v2: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> suggested that noaliencache should be
> >> > removed too. Here adding this change. The patch is based on [1].
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/linux.git/log/?h=slab-
> remove-
> >> slab-v2r1
> >> >
> >> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20231120091214.150502-1-
> >> sxwjean@me.com/T/#m55ebb45851bc86d650baf65dfe8296d33c5b1126
> >> > ---
> >> >  Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 10 ----------
> >> >  1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> b/Documentation/admin-
> >> guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >> > index 65731b060e3f..d56a5beefe24 100644
> >> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >> > @@ -3740,10 +3740,6 @@
> >> >       no5lvl          [X86-64,RISCV] Disable 5-level paging mode. Forces
> >> >                       kernel to use 4-level paging instead.
> >> >
> >> > -     noaliencache    [MM, NUMA, SLAB] Disables the allocation of alien
> >> > -                     caches in the slab allocator.  Saves per-node memory,
> >> > -                     but will impact performance.
> >>
> >> No question about this one, can be deleted.
> >>
> >> > -
> >> >       noalign         [KNL,ARM]
> >> >
> >> >       noaltinstr      [S390] Disables alternative instructions patching
> >> > @@ -5887,12 +5883,6 @@
> >> >                       own.
> >> >                       For more information see Documentation/mm/slub.rst.
> >> >
> >> > -     slab_max_order= [MM, SLAB]
> >> > -                     Determines the maximum allowed order for slabs.
> >> > -                     A high setting may cause OOMs due to memory
> >> > -                     fragmentation.  Defaults to 1 for systems with
> >> > -                     more than 32MB of RAM, 0 otherwise.
> >>
> >> I think here we should consider the long-term plan first. It's a bit
> >> unfortunate (in hindsight) SLUB brought its own prefix of parameters, even
> >> if some became interchangeable aliases later (slab/slub_nomerge), some not.
> >> I think it would be best to unify them, and consider the string "slub" an
> >> implementation detail of the general "slab allocator" term going forward.
> >>
> >> So what I'd propose is that we change all parameters to accept a
> >> "slab_$param" as a primary and documented name (and the description can
> >> contain just [MM] tag, no [SLAB] or [SLUB] needed), with "slub_$param" is
> >> also accepted as an alias where it exists today, and there's just a note
> >> that the slub_$param name is also accepted in the description of the
> >> canonical parameter, not in a separate description. Then maybe in a few
> >> years we can mark the old names as deprecated and start issuing low-key
> >> warnings (while still accepting them), and in 10 years maybe remove them
> >> completely. Thoughts?
> >
> > Sorry, I didn't know the SLUB history, thanks for the comments and proposal.
> >
> > Did you mean the rough diff below?
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-
> guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > index 65731b060e3f..db6d2ebe7c7d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > @@ -5871,10 +5871,12 @@
> >          slram=          [HW,MTD]
> >
> >          slab_merge      [MM]
> > +       slub_merge      [MM]
> >                          Enable merging of slabs with similar size when the
> >                          kernel is built without CONFIG_SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULT.
> 
> I'd hope the result look more like this, so the duplicate names are not
> so prominent.
> 
>         slab_merge      [MM]
>                         Enable merging of slabs with similar size when the
>                         kernel is built without CONFIG_SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULT.
>                         (slub_merge also accepted as an alias)
> 
> Note that it's not just a Documentation change anymore, as many of the
> parameters don't have the slab_ variants yet wired up.

Ok, thanks. Will create a patch for it.

Regards,
Xiongwei

> 
> >
> >          slab_nomerge    [MM]
> > +       slub_nomerge    [MM]
> >                          Disable merging of slabs with similar size. May be
> >                          necessary if there is some reason to distinguish
> >                          allocs to different slabs, especially in hardened
> > @@ -5887,12 +5889,6 @@
> >                          own.
> >                          For more information see Documentation/mm/slub.rst.
> >
> > -       slab_max_order= [MM, SLAB]
> > -                       Determines the maximum allowed order for slabs.
> > -                       A high setting may cause OOMs due to memory
> > -                       fragmentation.  Defaults to 1 for systems with
> > -                       more than 32MB of RAM, 0 otherwise.
> > -
> >          slub_debug[=options[,slabs][;[options[,slabs]]...]      [MM, SLUB]
> >                          Enabling slub_debug allows one to determine the
> >                          culprit if slab objects become corrupted. Enabling
> > @@ -5901,13 +5897,15 @@
> >                          last alloc / free. For more information see
> >                          Documentation/mm/slub.rst.
> >
> > -       slub_max_order= [MM, SLUB]
> > +       slab_max_order= [MM]
> > +       slub_max_order= [MM]
> >                          Determines the maximum allowed order for slabs.
> >                          A high setting may cause OOMs due to memory
> >                          fragmentation. For more information see
> >                          Documentation/mm/slub.rst.
> >
> > -       slub_min_objects=       [MM, SLUB]
> > +       slab_min_objects=       [MM]
> > +       slub_min_objects=       [MM]
> >                          The minimum number of objects per slab. SLUB will
> >                          increase the slab order up to slub_max_order to
> >                          generate a sufficiently large slab able to contain
> > @@ -5916,18 +5914,12 @@
> >                          and the less frequently locks need to be acquired.
> >                          For more information see Documentation/mm/slub.rst.
> >
> > -       slub_min_order= [MM, SLUB]
> > +       slub_min_order= [MM]
> > +       slab_min_order= [MM]
> >                          Determines the minimum page order for slabs.
> > Must be
> >                          lower than slub_max_order.
> >                          For more information see Documentation/mm/slub.rst.
> >
> > -       slub_merge      [MM, SLUB]
> > -                       Same with slab_merge.
> > -
> > -       slub_nomerge    [MM, SLUB]
> > -                       Same with slab_nomerge. This is supported for
> > legacy.
> > -                       See slab_nomerge for more information.
> > -
> >          smart2=         [HW]
> >                          Format: <io1>[,<io2>[,...,<io8>]]
> >
> > If so I think we should use slab_&param in mm/slub.c. When hitting "slub_$param"
> > we need to assign the value to "slab_&param" like "slab_nomerge", right?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Xiongwei


  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-28  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-22 14:36 sxwjean
2023-11-23  0:33 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-11-24 11:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-11-26  7:25   ` Song, Xiongwei
2023-11-27 12:02     ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-11-28  5:18       ` Song, Xiongwei [this message]
2023-11-27  0:26   ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-11-27 11:52     ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=PH0PR11MB51929C73CA26257742E7D1DDECBCA@PH0PR11MB5192.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=xiongwei.song@windriver.com \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=sxwjean@me.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox