From: "Song, Xiongwei" <Xiongwei.Song@windriver.com>
To: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
"sxwjean@me.com" <sxwjean@me.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] mm/slub: Simplify get_partial_node()
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 06:15:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB51924D5FA695AAEC0E41428EEC2A2@PH0PR11MB5192.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38beee7c-aceb-4d59-ac79-e7e412a01588@linux.dev>
> On 2024/3/12 22:05, sxwjean@me.com wrote:
> > From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
> >
> > Remove the check of !kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial() because it is always
> > false, we've known this by calling kmem_cache_debug() before calling
> > remove_partial(), so we can remove the check.
> >
> > Meanwhile, redo filling cpu partial and add comment to improve the
> > readability.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Use "#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL)" to instead
> > "if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL))" to fix build error.
> > (Thanks Chengming Zhou)
> > - Add __maybe_unused for partial_slabs to prevent compiler warning.
> >
> > v1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20240311132720.37741-1-sxwjean@me.com/T/
> > ---
> > mm/slub.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > index a3ab096c38c0..ab526960ee5b 100644
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -2588,7 +2588,7 @@ static struct slab *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s,
> > {
> > struct slab *slab, *slab2, *partial = NULL;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > - unsigned int partial_slabs = 0;
> > + unsigned int __maybe_unused partial_slabs = 0;
> >
> > /*
> > * Racy check. If we mistakenly see no partial slabs then we
> > @@ -2620,19 +2620,21 @@ static struct slab *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s,
> > if (!partial) {
> > partial = slab;
> > stat(s, ALLOC_FROM_PARTIAL);
> > - } else {
> > - put_cpu_partial(s, slab, 0);
> > - stat(s, CPU_PARTIAL_NODE);
> > - partial_slabs++;
> > +
> > + /* Fill cpu partial if needed from next iteration, or break */
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL))
> > + continue;
> > + else
> > + break;
> > }
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
> > - if (!kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s)
> > - || partial_slabs > s->cpu_partial_slabs / 2)
> > +
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL)
>
> Hmm, these two CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL look verbose to me :(
>
> How about using just one, maybe like this?
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 2ef88bbf56a3..a018c715b648 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2620,19 +2620,16 @@ static struct slab *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s,
> if (!partial) {
> partial = slab;
> stat(s, ALLOC_FROM_PARTIAL);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
> } else {
I don't like splitting "if...else..." up with preprocessor directives personally. It's messy for me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-13 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-12 14:05 sxwjean
2024-03-12 15:22 ` Chengming Zhou
2024-03-13 6:15 ` Song, Xiongwei [this message]
2024-03-13 23:36 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH0PR11MB51924D5FA695AAEC0E41428EEC2A2@PH0PR11MB5192.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=xiongwei.song@windriver.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=sxwjean@me.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox