From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from northrelay01.pok.ibm.com (northrelay01.pok.ibm.com [9.117.200.21]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA395590 for ; Sat, 26 May 2001 12:36:26 -0400 Received: from d01ml233.pok.ibm.com (d01ml233.pok.ibm.com [9.117.200.63]) by northrelay01.pok.ibm.com (8.8.8m3/NCO v4.96) with ESMTP id MAA227988 for ; Sat, 26 May 2001 12:38:03 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Bulent Abali" Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 12:38:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Is it reasonable to assume that matching alloc_pages/free_pages pairs will always have the same order as the 2nd argument? For example pg = alloc_pages( , aorder); free_pages(pg, forder); Is (aorder == forder) always true? Or, are there any bizarro drivers etc which will intentionally free partial amounts, that is (forder < aorder)? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/