linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zhang.yi20@zte.com.cn
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] futex: bugfix for futex-key conflict when futex use hugepage
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:05:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <OF7B3DF162.973A9AD7-ON48257B51.00299512-48257B51.002C7D65@zte.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <516EC508.6070200@linux.intel.com>

Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> wrote on 2013/04/17 23:51:36:

> On 04/17/2013 08:26 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 04/17/2013 07:18 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
> >>>> This also needs a comment in futex.h describing the usage of the
> >>>> offset field in union futex_key as well as above get_futex_key
> >>>> describing the key for shared mappings.
> >>>>
> >>> As far as I know , the max size of one hugepage is 1 GBytes for 
> >>> x86 cpu. Can some other cpus support greater hugepage even more 
> >>> than 4 GBytes? If so, we can change the type of 'offset' from int 
> >>>  to long to avoid truncating.
> >>
> >> I discussed this with Dave Hansen, on CC, and he thought we needed
> >> 9 bits, so even on x86 32b we should be covered.
> > 
> > I think the problem is actually on 64-bit since you still only have
> > 32-bits in an 'int' there.
> > 
> > I guess it's remotely possible that we could have some
> > mega-super-huge-gigantic pages show up in hardware some day, or that
> > somebody would come up with software-only one.  I bet there's a lot
> > more code that will break in the kernel than this futex code, though.
> > 
> > The other option would be to start #defining some build-time constant
> > for what the largest possible huge page size is, then BUILD_BUG_ON()
> > it.
> >
> > Or you can just make it a long ;)
> 
> If we make it a long I'd want to see futextest performance tests before
> and after. Messing with the futex_key has been known to have bad results
> in the past :-)
> 
> -- 
 
I have run futextest/performance/futex_wait for testing, 5 times before 
make it long:
futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
        Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 10215 Kiter/s

futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
        Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 9862 Kiter/s

futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
        Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 10081 Kiter/s

futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
        Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 10060 Kiter/s

futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
        Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 10081 Kiter/s


And 5 times after make it long:
futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
        Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 9940 Kiter/s

futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
        Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 10204 Kiter/s

futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
        Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 9901 Kiter/s

futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
        Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 10152 Kiter/s

futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
        Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 10060 Kiter/s


Seems OK, is it?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-18  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-16  3:37 zhang.yi20
2013-04-16 17:57 ` Darren Hart
2013-04-17  9:55   ` zhang.yi20
2013-04-17 14:18     ` Darren Hart
2013-04-17 15:26       ` Dave Hansen
2013-04-17 15:51         ` Darren Hart
2013-04-18  8:05           ` zhang.yi20 [this message]
2013-04-18 14:34             ` Darren Hart
2013-04-19  2:13               ` zhang.yi20
2013-04-19  2:42                 ` Darren Hart
2013-04-19  2:45                 ` Darren Hart
2013-04-19  7:03                   ` zhang.yi20
2013-04-18 10:14   ` 答复: " zhang.yi20
2013-04-16 18:37 ` Dave Hansen
2013-04-16 18:47   ` Darren Hart
2013-04-17  7:25   ` 答复: " zhang.yi20
2013-04-17  7:47   ` zhang.yi20

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=OF7B3DF162.973A9AD7-ON48257B51.00299512-48257B51.002C7D65@zte.com.cn \
    --to=zhang.yi20@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox