From: zhang.yi20@zte.com.cn
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] futex: bugfix for futex-key conflict when futex use hugepage
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:05:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OF7B3DF162.973A9AD7-ON48257B51.00299512-48257B51.002C7D65@zte.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <516EC508.6070200@linux.intel.com>
Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> wrote on 2013/04/17 23:51:36:
> On 04/17/2013 08:26 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 04/17/2013 07:18 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
> >>>> This also needs a comment in futex.h describing the usage of the
> >>>> offset field in union futex_key as well as above get_futex_key
> >>>> describing the key for shared mappings.
> >>>>
> >>> As far as I know , the max size of one hugepage is 1 GBytes for
> >>> x86 cpu. Can some other cpus support greater hugepage even more
> >>> than 4 GBytes? If so, we can change the type of 'offset' from int
> >>> to long to avoid truncating.
> >>
> >> I discussed this with Dave Hansen, on CC, and he thought we needed
> >> 9 bits, so even on x86 32b we should be covered.
> >
> > I think the problem is actually on 64-bit since you still only have
> > 32-bits in an 'int' there.
> >
> > I guess it's remotely possible that we could have some
> > mega-super-huge-gigantic pages show up in hardware some day, or that
> > somebody would come up with software-only one. I bet there's a lot
> > more code that will break in the kernel than this futex code, though.
> >
> > The other option would be to start #defining some build-time constant
> > for what the largest possible huge page size is, then BUILD_BUG_ON()
> > it.
> >
> > Or you can just make it a long ;)
>
> If we make it a long I'd want to see futextest performance tests before
> and after. Messing with the futex_key has been known to have bad results
> in the past :-)
>
> --
I have run futextest/performance/futex_wait for testing, 5 times before
make it long:
futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 10215 Kiter/s
futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 9862 Kiter/s
futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 10081 Kiter/s
futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 10060 Kiter/s
futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 10081 Kiter/s
And 5 times after make it long:
futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 9940 Kiter/s
futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 10204 Kiter/s
futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 9901 Kiter/s
futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 10152 Kiter/s
futex_wait: Measure FUTEX_WAIT operations per second
Arguments: iterations=100000000 threads=256
Result: 10060 Kiter/s
Seems OK, is it?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-18 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-16 3:37 zhang.yi20
2013-04-16 17:57 ` Darren Hart
2013-04-17 9:55 ` zhang.yi20
2013-04-17 14:18 ` Darren Hart
2013-04-17 15:26 ` Dave Hansen
2013-04-17 15:51 ` Darren Hart
2013-04-18 8:05 ` zhang.yi20 [this message]
2013-04-18 14:34 ` Darren Hart
2013-04-19 2:13 ` zhang.yi20
2013-04-19 2:42 ` Darren Hart
2013-04-19 2:45 ` Darren Hart
2013-04-19 7:03 ` zhang.yi20
2013-04-18 10:14 ` 答复: " zhang.yi20
2013-04-16 18:37 ` Dave Hansen
2013-04-16 18:47 ` Darren Hart
2013-04-17 7:25 ` 答复: " zhang.yi20
2013-04-17 7:47 ` zhang.yi20
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OF7B3DF162.973A9AD7-ON48257B51.00299512-48257B51.002C7D65@zte.com.cn \
--to=zhang.yi20@zte.com.cn \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox