From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4INwQNs022790 for ; Wed, 18 May 2005 19:58:26 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j4INwQPE153174 for ; Wed, 18 May 2005 19:58:26 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4INwQAf015546 for ; Wed, 18 May 2005 19:58:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1116456143.26913.1303.camel@dyn318077bld.beaverton.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: page flags ? Message-ID: From: Bryan Henderson Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 16:57:09 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: pbadari@us.ibm.com Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: By the way, shouldn't these really be PG_as_misc/PG_as_specific as opposed to PG_fs_misc ...? In theory, an address space can be something other than a file cache, and there's no reason any arbitrary adress_space_ops shouldn't have its own private flags. -- Bryan Henderson IBM Almaden Research Center San Jose CA Filesystems -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org